I think the bottom line is that the FCC is under funded and under staffed
and we amateurs are a low priority. Maybe a concerted letter writing to
our congressional representatives is in order.
The funding and the staffing is there. Who among us has looked at the
Commission's budget and analyzed every aspect of it? It's takes strong
leadership to recognize a significant problem and bring about change.
When I hear these underfuding/over-worked arguments, I'm reminded of the
movie "Dave," where Kevin Kline plays the part of our President. To deal
with a myriad of complex budgetary issues, he enlists the assistance of his
CPA friend. Together, over a couple days, they have whittled away at huge
chunks of unnecessary spending in the federal budget.
I have no doubt that Commission funding is adequate. Don't be all-to-quick
to give in to that red herring. What's needed is budget accountability and
that includes a re-allocation of funding and a re-balancing of human
resources and priorities.
In addition to these changes, global federal changes are needed in the
FERS/CSRS retirement system to reign-in agency costs. Why in 2014, are we
still allowing federal workers to retire at the age of 55 when the
Department of HHS's computed life span for men and women now averages 82
years of age? My father in-law retired under CSRS at 55. He's now 86.
Last year marked the beginning of the period where the U.S. Government has
paid him more in time -- and substantially more in dollars than during the
30 year period in which he worked for a federal agency. In total, we have
now paid out $1.8 million to just one person -- for not working and the
lion's share of that retirement contribution has come from U.S. tax payers.
Let's further move toward a system where the retirement age for Congress and
federal workers moves lock-step with Social Security, regardless of years of
service.
Just how much funding does it take to amend 47 CFR 15.103(d), for example?
The Commission has always had the power to invoke a Petition for Rulemaking
on its own motion. Yet, despite attempts by prominent organizations like
the the NAB and affluent AM Broadcast group owners, the Commission (via
Congress) has yielded to the concerns of manufacturers who produce EMI/RFI
generating appliances. We need to severely limit Congressional influence
by large organizations, enforce the laws already codified, and strengthen
what's already there -- even if that means a Constitutional Amendment.
I'm not naïve in making an oversimplification of the problem. I know change
isn’t easy when it's human nature to leave the status quo and cave in to
pressure, especially when your livelihood depends on it.
Paul, W9AC
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|