Like most things at ARRL, Dave, it is a combination of things that come
together. The Board sets the policies that are behind this, the League
President (Kay Craigie), our counsel (Chris Imlay) and a number of staff all
had a role in this. The Lab was consulted on some of the things said about
radio interference.
Yes, I am thankful, too, but the reason that ARRL has the resources to do this
is because 165,000 hams chipped in. My share of the time spent to write that
filing and submit it was probably about 50 cents, less than the cup of coffee I
casually drank this morning.
Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: RFI [mailto:rfi-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of David Cole
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 1:18 AM
To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: [RFI] ARRL to FCC II
Someone responded to me privately, with a link to the ARRL web site, covering
exactly the subject of visibility of enforcement.
I have no idea who at the ARRL caused this:
http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-calls-for-timely-visible-fcc-amateur-radio-enforcement
but I am thankful they are busy helping!
THis sort of action can only help reduce the RFI and make visible to the
Amature community the FCC is doing something to help!
--
Support better RFI practices, please sign this petition:
at Whitehouse.gov
http://wh.gov/lpz5Y
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|