RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Solar Power RFI

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] Solar Power RFI
From: Cortland Richmond <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: ka5s@earthlink.net
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 00:43:41 -0500
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
On 1/30/2016 12:35 PM, Michael St. Angelo wrote:
FCC compliance does not eliminate all RFI, it sets maximum limits for
various frequency ranges. Even if it compliant it may interfere in some weak
signal conditions.

Even if a device using or generating RF meets Part 15 limits (its unlawful to sell otherwise) it can still cause harmful interference -- which makes it illegal for us to turn it on/(see § 15.15 General technical requirements./, below). States that enforce implied warranty place the burden on sellers; that's why they like to disavow any implied warranty of suitability. See for example the Michigan law on THAT at http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-440-2316

Note that I am not an attorney and this isn't legal advice.

And here's where we violate FCC rules by turning it on:

/§ 15.15 General technical requirements./

/(a) An intentional or unintentional radiator shall be constructed in accordance with good engineering design and manufacturing practice. Emanations from the device shall be suppressed as much as practicable, but in no case shall the emanations exceed the levels specified in these rules. /

/(b) An intentional or unintentional radiator must be constructed such that the adjustments of any control that is readily accessible by or intended to be accessible to the user will not cause operation of the device in violation of the regulations. /

/(c) Parties responsible for equipment compliance should note that the limits specified in this part will not prevent harmful interference under all circumstances. Since *the operators of part 15 devices are required to cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum*, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve harmful interference problem (for example, see § 15.105(b))./

emphasis added

Cortland Richmond
ka5s

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>