RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] If only everything were tested this way...

To: "RFI Mail list at contesting.com" <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] If only everything were tested this way...
From: "Charlie@thegallos.com" <charlie@thegallos.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:06:29 -0500
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Most military electronics have the same thing done
Look at Mil-STD-461 
Spent enough time in Faraday cages testing this back when
The Sat is probably tested to CE102 and 106(conducted 
emissions),CS101,102,103,104,105,114,115,116,117(conducted susceptibility), RE 
102,103 (Radiated Emissions) and RS103 (radiated susceptibility)
There are other tests, depending on environment. For instance stuff on Surface 
Ships has more Radiated Susceptibility testing due to the radars etc.
All sorts of fun, and why I’ve said “yes you can make clean switchers”, because 
I’ve tested them to may/most of the specs. (Again, in the 80s)

—  
Charlie
73 de KG2V
Http://www.thegallos.com


> On Mar 4, 2020, at 9:16 AM, Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net> wrote:
> 
> This is an interesting article on RFI in space...
> 
> https://phys.org/news/2020-03-routine-radio-frequency-moon-bound-orion-spacecraft.html
> 
> -- 
> 73, and thanks,
> Dave (NK7Z)
> https://www.nk7z.net
> ARRL Volunteer Examiner
> ARRL Technical Specialist
> ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>