RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 218, Issue 29

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 218, Issue 29
From: Kenneth Wyatt via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Kenneth Wyatt <wyattphoto@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:37:50 -0600
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Hi Ray, thanks for that link. As an EMC engineer, I assumed “loop antennas” 
were designed much like fully shielded (balanced) H-field probes I use in the 
near field. I had no idea of the variety of “shielded loop antennas”, so that 
link was very educational. Thanks!

Ken
________________
Ken Wyatt
wyattphoto@mac.com





> On Mar 23, 2021, at 1:45 PM, rfi-request@contesting.com wrote:
> 
> Send RFI mailing list submissions to
>       rfi@contesting.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       rfi-request@contesting.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       rfi-owner@contesting.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RFI digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: RFI Digest, Vol 218, Issue 27 (Ray LaRue)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:45:30 +0000
> From: Ray LaRue <w4byg@att.net>
> To: rfi@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 218, Issue 27
> Message-ID: <cd0ae380-11e0-541f-2994-b6205a152df9@att.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> I'm afraid the email below is just repeating an error about how loop 
> antennas work. (They say if you hear something repeated enough times it 
> is is perceived as truth). But not so. For an excellent paper on how 
> loop antennas work see:
> 
> https://w8ji.com/magnetic_receiving_loops.htm
> 
> Ray, W4BYG
> 
> 
> On 3/23/2021 19:16, Kenneth Wyatt via RFI wrote:
>> Tom,
>> 
>> The usual loop antenna design picks up magnetic fields, which tend to be 
>> dominant from SMPS transformers and inductors.
>> 
>> Cheers, Ken
>> ________________
>> Ken Wyatt
>> wyattphoto@mac.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 23, 2021, at 1:11 PM, rfi-request@contesting.com wrote:
>>> 
>>> Send RFI mailing list submissions to
>>>     rfi@contesting.com
>>> 
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>     http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>     rfi-request@contesting.com
>>> 
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>     rfi-owner@contesting.com
>>> 
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of RFI digest..."
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Today's Topics:
>>> 
>>>   1. Re: New Interference at kk0sd (Tom Thompson)
>>>   2. Re: New Interference at kk0sd (Don Kirk)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:27:45 -0600
>>> From: Tom Thompson <w0ivj@tomthompson.com>
>>> To: Mike Martin <mike@rfiservices.com>, Gary
>>>     <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
>>> Cc: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd
>>> Message-ID: <fff7cac5-fe47-3b8a-20f1-349436e51149@tomthompson.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>>> 
>>> See:? http://tomthompson.com/radio/ReceivingLoop/loop.html? for a tuned
>>> loop.? You can build one in a couple of hours from your junk box.? This
>>> type of loop does not work well for power line noise ( a vhf yagi is
>>> better for that), but it does work well for switch mode RFI.? Since most
>>> of these noise sources are vertically? polarized, look through the loop
>>> for the null and along the edge for the peak. When close to the source,
>>> the polarization may switch.
>>> 
>>> 73,?? Tom?? W0IVJ
>>> 
>>> On 3/23/2021 6:32 AM, Mike Martin wrote:
>>>> Remember in his shack he has a very good radio and a very good antenna 
>>>> which together increased sensitivity and allow him to hear much further 
>>>> away. when he goes outside with a portable and a smaller antenna he 
>>>> doesn't have the sensitivity he had inside there for he may have to travel 
>>>> a lot further before he's able to receive it.
>>>> 
>>>> ?Be safe,
>>>> Mike
>>>> 
>>>> Get BlueMail for Android ?
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 22, 2021, 11:37 PM, at 11:37 PM, Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Kim,
>>>>> 
>>>>>   I hear it on the portable when connected to the vertical antenna, but
>>>>> will undertake an antenna substitution experiment this weekend.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Keep the suggestions coming!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 73 and Thanks,
>>>>> Gary "Joe", kk0sd
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: RFI <rfi-bounces+gary_mayfield=hotmail.com@contesting.com> On
>>>>> Behalf Of Kim Elmore
>>>>> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 4:44 PM
>>>>> To: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
>>>>> Cc: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd
>>>>> 
>>>>> That?s a great idea, too! I once ran into an interference problem that
>>>>> was inherent to the antenna, but only under certain conditions. It
>>>>> didn?t sound like Gary?s but I pulled a lot of hair out fixing that
>>>>> one. I?m simply suspicious that he hears NOTHING with his portable rx
>>>>> so I?m after eliminating anything inherent to his station. Standing by
>>>>> his vertical with his portable rx is a great idea.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 73,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kim N5OP
>>>>> 
>>>>> "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as
>>>>> the music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:24 PM, Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I still recommend tuned and untuned loops to folks on an almost daily
>>>>> basis but they definitely don?t shed as much light on the situation as
>>>>> a unidirectional antenna does.  It would be nice to see what your
>>>>> shielded untuned loop design is.
>>>>>> The beauty of the portable flag which is unidirectional is that you
>>>>> typically can walk right to the source (no guessing which direction the
>>>>> signal is coming from).  I still pack 7 antennas when I go on a RFI
>>>>> case, and this includes 3 tuned HF loops, but I have found that I
>>>>> typically don?t use bidirectional loops anymore (unless I?m trying to
>>>>> be more stealth) as the portable flag saves me an enormous amount of
>>>>> time.  Also in heavily congested areas (like downtown Indianapolis)
>>>>> having the unidirectional HF antenna is priceless as it unmasks noise
>>>>> that?s mixing from other sources that are in the opposite direction,
>>>>> etc.  Yesterday I worked on a case (more of a country setting) where I
>>>>> had 2 different bad poles that were only 0.14 miles apart plus a 3rd
>>>>> RFI source generating spikes every 1 KHz within the same area and
>>>>> having the unidirectional HF antenna helped me locate all 3 sources in
>>>>> a matter of minutes (way under an hour).
>>>>>> You can never have enough antennas in your direction finding bag of
>>>>> tricks but after using a unidirectional HF antenna like the portable
>>>>> flag for direction finding I can?t imagine not using one.  It typically
>>>>> takes me seconds to tell which direction the signal is without the need
>>>>> of triangulation, etc.  Traditional triangulation has almost become a
>>>>> thing of the past for me.
>>>>>> I also have been helping a ham that has the MFJ unit (the one with a
>>>>> beam and the one with a dipole) and while it has helped him, it has an
>>>>> odd characteristic that makes the meter jump which causes confusion to
>>>>> him and after looking at the schematic I question how they implemented
>>>>> AGC in those units.  I?m starting to think AGC in a radio direction
>>>>> finding system is typically not desirable.  Manual attenuation is
>>>>> priceless but I don?t want anything changing gain automatically.
>>>>>> Just my opinion from tracking down RFI on an almost continuous basis
>>>>> in addition to my day job.
>>>>>> Please share details on your shielded untuned loop and thanks.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 73,
>>>>>> Don wd8dsb
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:22 PM David Eckhardt
>>>>> <davearea51a@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> We recently found a faulty lightning 'arrestor' on a pole by using
>>>>>>> both the MFJ device and a small shielded loop (easy home brew
>>>>>>> project) into a battery-powered receiver.  We had two of us in the
>>>>>>> field.  One wielded the MFJ and I had the small (0.5-meter) shielded
>>>>>>> loop fed into the Yaesu VR-500 on 1.830 MHz (160-meters).  We both
>>>>>>> independently found the same source / pole in the field.  The null
>>>>> on
>>>>>>> the shielded loop is extremely sharp and this piece of hardware
>>>>>>> should be in the bag of tricks of anyone sleuthing RFI.  It is a
>>>>>>> powerful tool when coupled to a battery-powered receiver with its
>>>>>>> extremely sharp null (perpendicular to the plane of the loop).  One
>>>>> doesn't need something as large as the 'Flag" that was recently
>>>>> published
>>>>>>> in QST and referred to in a previous post in this thread.   Another
>>>>> plus
>>>>>>> for the shielded loop is that in the field, one can tune the
>>>>> receiver
>>>>>>> to the worst-case frequency of the RFI as I did in the related
>>>>> story, above.
>>>>>>> The shielded loop is untuned.  The MFJ relies only on VHF noise.
>>>>> In some
>>>>>>> cases, an ultrasonic microphone at the focus of a small parabolic or
>>>>>>> spherical reflector is good at finding coronal discharges as well as
>>>>>>> active arcs and discharges.  MFJ also makes that at a reasonable
>>>>> price.
>>>>>>> Our power provider was out the next day to fix the problem.  We even
>>>>>>> gave them the pole number which is a great help to any power
>>>>> provider.
>>>>>>> Dave - W?LEV
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:28 AM Kim Elmore
>>>>> <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> It's odd that you can't hear it on your portable rx. That made me
>>>>>>>> curious: What if this is something internal to your '847? Have you
>>>>>>>> tried pulling your '847 and listening on a different receiver
>>>>> using
>>>>>>>> the same antenna? If you have, do you still hear the noise? It's a
>>>>> long shot, but...
>>>>>>>> Kim N5OP
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2021 7:28 PM, Gary wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Mike,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>                  Thanks for the info. I understand locating the
>>>>>>>>> noise is
>>>>>>>> more important than identifying the noise. I am just try to play
>>>>>>>> all the angles as I was hoping to work the WPX contest nest
>>>>>>>> weekend. I have been walking the neighborhood a good chunk of the
>>>>>>>> afternoon, and have not been able to hear the noise on my portable
>>>>>>>> shortwave and loop antenna. It is as strong as ever on my home
>>>>> station.
>>>>>>>>>                  I have an MFJ 852 Noise Finder and it seems to
>>>>>>>>> go crazy
>>>>>>>> when broadside to any house. The neighbors on each side of me
>>>>> drive
>>>>>>>> the meter full scale.
>>>>>>>>>                  Yep I only want to knock on one door, as I know
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> can get dicey. I would rather place a call to a utility, but can?t
>>>>>>>> really do either until I know.
>>>>>>>>>                  Keep the suggestions coming!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks and 73,
>>>>>>>>> Gary ?Joe? kk0sd
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> From: Mike Martin <mike@rfiservices.com>
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 6:53 PM
>>>>>>>>> To: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> Cc: rfi@contesting.com
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Joe I haven't had time to read all the other input but I can
>>>>> tell
>>>>>>>>> you it
>>>>>>>> is not an arcing source or a sparking source. either one of the
>>>>> two
>>>>>>>> would be much broader than what you're reporting. if someone were
>>>>>>>> to tell you exactly what it is you really wouldn't be any further
>>>>>>>> ahead. You would still have to find which residents or business
>>>>>>>> it's in. My suggestion would be to either go mobile or on foot,
>>>>>>>> preferably on foot listening to the frequency that you know the
>>>>>>>> problem affects. once you locate the residents then go through the
>>>>>>>> breaker scenario and locate what the source is. Be 100% certain of
>>>>>>>> the structure or home that the problem is in before knocking on
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> door. The last thing you want to do is start guessing. Guessing
>>>>> we'll ruin the relationship with your neighbors.
>>>>>>>>> Be safe,
>>>>>>>>> Mike k3RFI
>>>>>>>>> www.rfiservices.com<http://www.rfiservices.com>
>>>>>>>>> Get BlueMail for Android<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=16696>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2021, at 2:01 PM, Gary
>>>>> <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com<mailto:
>>>>>>>> gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> My last problem was tracked down to a neon sign in a neighbors
>>>>>>>>> garage. I
>>>>>>>> had several months of blissful relatively low noise operation, but
>>>>>>>> now have a new RFI issue.
>>>>>>>>> You can see a recording of it here:
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKf4P44FXMo
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I have turned all of the breakers in my home off and run the
>>>>>>>>> radio from
>>>>>>>> a battery and the noise remains.
>>>>>>>>> My neighborhood utilities are all underground.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> There are no solar installations in my neighborhood, and the
>>>>>>>>> noise is
>>>>>>>> there at night anyway...
>>>>>>>>> The noise is not detectable on the AM broadcast band, but starts
>>>>>>>>> around
>>>>>>>> 2 MHz and runs to at least 6 meters.
>>>>>>>>> It is there 7 days a week 24 hours a day.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It is not detectable from my pickup when I drive the streets of
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>> neighborhood (checking both AM broadcast and Shortwave).
>>>>>>>>> If any one has heard something like this, I would love to hear
>>>>>>>>> what you
>>>>>>>> found.
>>>>>>>>> Thank You for your input and help!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 73,
>>>>>>>>> Gary "Joe",  kk0sd
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>>>>>> RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Kim Elmore, Ph.D. (Adj. Assoc. Prof., OU School of Meteorology,
>>>>>>>> CCM, PP SEL/MEL/Glider, N5OP, 2nd Class Radiotelegraph, GROL)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> /"A great second violinist plays second fiddle to no one." //?
>>>>> Robert C.
>>>>>>>> Marsh, Chicago Sun-Times./
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> *Dave - W?LEV*
>>>>>>> *Just Let Darwin Work*
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:11:11 -0400
>>> From: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
>>> To: Mike Martin <mike@rfiservices.com>
>>> Cc: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>, Kim Elmore
>>>     <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>,     Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd
>>> Message-ID:
>>>     <CAKtW65d94DMhbd3RW8eP9Q8XaiK9Y5Yr-HOiyz6rD5vqar3vhw@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>>> 
>>> Hi Mike, Gary, and gang,
>>> 
>>> Well after seeing Garys shielded un-tuned loop, I watched the video on how
>>> to build that loop.  I just built one almost identical to his loop but used
>>> RG-58 coax since that's what I had on hand.  I also spent 10 seconds
>>> building a simple 1 turn 9 inch loop (no form, just free standing) for
>>> comparisons which is even smaller than Garys loop, and I can tell you there
>>> is no comparison.  Without doing any impedance matching, the 9 inch
>>> un-tuned single turn loop I built has a gain that is approximately 23 dB
>>> greater than Garys loop when tested in the AM broadcast band and it still
>>> exhibits nice nulls which comes as no surprise.  My single turn non
>>> shielded loop just has about 6 inches of twisted wire (the same wire that
>>> forms the loop) to form the feedline to it, and then I just used a 3 foot
>>> piece of 50 ohm coax to connect it to my receiver.  I used the same 3 foot
>>> piece of coax to connect the shielded un-tuned loop to the receiver.  While
>>> my un-tuned 9 inch loop might not be as well balanced (one null might be
>>> deeper than the opposite null), it makes one fine DF antenna in a pinch.
>>> Also if Gary needs more gain he can just make the loop I made bigger in
>>> diameter.  It really just takes seconds to make this antenna (much less
>>> than a minute).
>>> 
>>> I now fully understand why Gary can't hear his noise, as his un-tuned
>>> shielded loop has very poor sensitivity based on my trying to copy the
>>> design.  While I normally use preamps with my DF loops, Garys RFI is so
>>> strong that I'm pretty darn sure he can make a simple one turn loop to
>>> figure out what possible directions the signal is coming from.  Something I
>>> have done in the past is to use a cardboard box as the antenna form as it
>>> does not have to be round.  Need to figure out what directions the signal
>>> is coming from before leaving his property if at all possible.
>>> 
>>> Just my opinion, and I will try and post some comparison videos but they
>>> will not be pretty as I'm buried in other tasks.
>>> 
>>> 73,
>>> Don (wd8dsb)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 8:33 AM Mike Martin <mike@rfiservices.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Remember in his shack he has a very good radio and a very good antenna
>>>> which together increased sensitivity and allow him to hear much further
>>>> away. when he goes outside with a portable and a smaller antenna he doesn't
>>>> have the sensitivity he had inside there for he may have to travel a lot
>>>> further before he's able to receive it.
>>>> 
>>>> Be safe,
>>>> Mike
>>>> 
>>>> Get BlueMail for Android <http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=16696>
>>>> On Mar 22, 2021, at 11:37 PM, Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Kim,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I hear it on the portable when connected to the vertical antenna, but 
>>>>> will undertake an antenna substitution experiment this weekend.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Keep the suggestions coming!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 73 and Thanks,
>>>>> Gary "Joe", kk0sd
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: RFI <rfi-bounces+gary_mayfield=hotmail.com@contesting.com> On 
>>>>> Behalf Of Kim Elmore
>>>>> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 4:44 PM
>>>>> To: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
>>>>> Cc: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd
>>>>> 
>>>>> That?s a great idea, too! I once ran into an interference problem that 
>>>>> was inherent to the antenna, but only under certain conditions. It didn?t 
>>>>> sound like Gary?s but I pulled a lot of hair out fixing that one. I?m 
>>>>> simply suspicious that he hears NOTHING with his portable rx so I?m after 
>>>>> eliminating anything inherent to his station. Standing by his vertical 
>>>>> with his portable rx is a great idea.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 73,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kim N5OP
>>>>> 
>>>>> "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as 
>>>>> the music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:24 PM, Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I still recommend tuned and untuned loops to folks on an almost daily 
>>>>>> basis but they definitely don?t shed as much light on the situation as a 
>>>>>> unidirectional antenna does.  It would be nice to see what your shielded 
>>>>>> untuned loop design is.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The beauty of the portable flag which is unidirectional is that you 
>>>>>> typically can walk right to the source (no guessing which direction the 
>>>>>> signal is coming from).  I still pack 7 antennas when I go on a RFI 
>>>>>> case, and this includes 3 tuned HF loops, but I have found that I 
>>>>>> typically don?t use bidirectional loops anymore (unless I?m trying to be 
>>>>>> more stealth) as the portable flag saves me an enormous amount of time.  
>>>>>> Also in heavily congested areas (like downtown Indianapolis) having the 
>>>>>> unidirectional HF antenna is priceless as it unmasks noise that?s mixing 
>>>>>> from other sources that are in the opposite direction, etc.  Yesterday I 
>>>>>> worked on a case (more of a country setting) where I had 2 different bad 
>>>>>> poles that were only 0.14 miles apart plus a 3rd RFI source generating 
>>>>>> spikes every 1 KHz within the same area and having the unidirectional HF 
>>>>>> antenna helped me locate all 3 sources in a matter of minutes (way under 
>>>>>> an hour).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You can never have enough antennas in your direction finding bag of 
>>>>>> tricks but after using a unidirectional HF antenna like the portable 
>>>>>> flag for direction finding I can?t imagine not using one.  It typically 
>>>>>> takes me seconds to tell which direction the signal is without the need 
>>>>>> of triangulation, etc.  Traditional triangulation has almost become a 
>>>>>> thing of the past for me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I also have been helping a ham that has the MFJ unit (the one with a 
>>>>>> beam and the one with a dipole) and while it has helped him, it has an 
>>>>>> odd characteristic that makes the meter jump which causes confusion to 
>>>>>> him and after looking at the schematic I question how they implemented 
>>>>>> AGC in those units.  I?m starting to think AGC in a radio direction 
>>>>>> finding system is typically not desirable.  Manual attenuation is 
>>>>>> priceless but I don?t want anything changing gain automatically.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Just my opinion from tracking down RFI on an almost continuous basis in 
>>>>>> addition to my day job.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please share details on your shielded untuned loop and thanks.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 73,
>>>>>> Don wd8dsb
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:22 PM David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> We recently found a faulty lightning 'arrestor' on a pole by using
>>>>>>> both the MFJ device and a small shielded loop (easy home brew
>>>>>>> project) into a battery-powered receiver.  We had two of us in the
>>>>>>> field.  One wielded the MFJ and I had the small (0.5-meter) shielded
>>>>>>> loop fed into the Yaesu VR-500 on 1.830 MHz (160-meters).  We both
>>>>>>> independently found the same source / pole in the field.  The null on
>>>>>>> the shielded loop is extremely sharp and this piece of hardware
>>>>>>> should be in the bag of tricks of anyone sleuthing RFI.  It is a
>>>>>>> powerful tool when coupled to a battery-powered receiver with its
>>>>>>> extremely sharp null (perpendicular to the plane of the loop).  One 
>>>>>>> doesn't need something as large as the 'Flag" that was recently 
>>>>>>> published
>>>>>>> in QST and referred to in a previous post in this thread.   Another plus
>>>>>>> for the shielded loop is that in the field, one can tune the receiver
>>>>>>> to the worst-case frequency of the RFI as I did in the related story, 
>>>>>>> above.
>>>>>>> The shielded loop is untuned.  The MFJ relies only on VHF noise.   In 
>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>> cases, an ultrasonic microphone at the focus of a small parabolic or
>>>>>>> spherical reflector is good at finding coronal discharges as well as
>>>>>>> active arcs and discharges.  MFJ also makes that at a reasonable price.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Our power provider was out the next day to fix the problem.  We even
>>>>>>> gave them the pole number which is a great help to any power provider.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dave - W?LEV
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:28 AM Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It's odd that you can't hear it on your portable rx. That made me
>>>>>>>> curious: What if this is something internal to your '847? Have you
>>>>>>>> tried pulling your '847 and listening on a different receiver using
>>>>>>>> the same antenna? If you have, do you still hear the noise? It's a 
>>>>>>>> long shot, but...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Kim N5OP
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2021 7:28 PM, Gary wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Mike,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>                  Thanks for the info. I understand locating the
>>>>>>>>> noise is
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> more important than identifying the noise. I am just try to play
>>>>>>>> all the angles as I was hoping to work the WPX contest nest
>>>>>>>> weekend. I have been walking the neighborhood a good chunk of the
>>>>>>>> afternoon, and have not been able to hear the noise on my portable
>>>>>>>> shortwave and loop antenna. It is as strong as ever on my home station.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>                  I have an MFJ 852 Noise Finder and it seems to
>>>>>>>>> go crazy
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> when broadside to any house. The neighbors on each side of me drive
>>>>>>>> the meter full scale.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>                  Yep I only want to knock on one door, as I know
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> can get dicey. I would rather place a call to a utility, but can?t
>>>>>>>> really do either until I know.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>                  Keep the suggestions coming!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks and 73,
>>>>>>>>> Gary ?Joe? kk0sd
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> From: Mike Martin <mike@rfiservices.com>
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 6:53 PM
>>>>>>>>> To: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> Cc: rfi@contesting.com
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Joe I haven't had time to read all the other input but I can tell
>>>>>>>>> you it
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> is not an arcing source or a sparking source. either one of the two
>>>>>>>> would be much broader than what you're reporting. if someone were
>>>>>>>> to tell you exactly what it is you really wouldn't be any further
>>>>>>>> ahead. You would still have to find which residents or business
>>>>>>>> it's in. My suggestion would be to either go mobile or on foot,
>>>>>>>> preferably on foot listening to the frequency that you know the
>>>>>>>> problem affects. once you locate the residents then go through the
>>>>>>>> breaker scenario and locate what the source is. Be 100% certain of
>>>>>>>> the structure or home that the problem is in before knocking on the
>>>>>>>> door. The last thing you want to do is start guessing. Guessing we'll 
>>>>>>>> ruin the relationship with your neighbors.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Be safe,
>>>>>>>>> Mike k3RFI
>>>>>>>>> www.rfiservices.com<http://www.rfiservices.com>
>>>>>>>>> Get BlueMail for Android<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=16696>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2021, at 2:01 PM, Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com<mailto:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> My last problem was tracked down to a neon sign in a neighbors
>>>>>>>>> garage. I
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> had several months of blissful relatively low noise operation, but
>>>>>>>> now have a new RFI issue.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> You can see a recording of it here:
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKf4P44FXMo
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I have turned all of the breakers in my home off and run the
>>>>>>>>> radio from
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> a battery and the noise remains.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> My neighborhood utilities are all underground.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> There are no solar installations in my neighborhood, and the
>>>>>>>>> noise is
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> there at night anyway...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The noise is not detectable on the AM broadcast band, but starts
>>>>>>>>> around
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2 MHz and runs to at least 6 meters.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It is there 7 days a week 24 hours a day.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It is not detectable from my pickup when I drive the streets of
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> neighborhood (checking both AM broadcast and Shortwave).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> If any one has heard something like this, I would love to hear
>>>>>>>>> what you
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> found.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thank You for your input and help!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 73,
>>>>>>>>> Gary "Joe",  kk0sd
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>>>>>> RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Kim Elmore, Ph.D. (Adj. Assoc. Prof., OU School of Meteorology,
>>>>>>>> CCM, PP SEL/MEL/Glider, N5OP, 2nd Class Radiotelegraph, GROL)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> /"A great second violinist plays second fiddle to no one." //? Robert 
>>>>>>>> C.
>>>>>>>> Marsh, Chicago Sun-Times./
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> *Dave - W?LEV*
>>>>>>> *Just Let Darwin Work*
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> RFI mailing list
>>>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RFI mailing list
>>> RFI@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> End of RFI Digest, Vol 218, Issue 27
>>> ************************************
>> _______________________________________________
>> RFI mailing list
>> RFI@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> 
> -- 
> They say a smart person learns from their mistakes.  A
> wise person learns from the mistakes of others.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of RFI Digest, Vol 218, Issue 29
> ************************************

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 218, Issue 29, Kenneth Wyatt via RFI <=