RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Working with Utilities

To: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Working with Utilities
From: Stephanie WX3K via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Stephanie WX3K <wx3k@ptd.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 20:08:44 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
“They are not responsible for noise from non-utility equipment and a few false 
complaints can quickly put amateurs to the bottom of their priority list, often 
not scheduled until Nevuary.

Ed, W1RFI“

Yep i understand that Ed. My reported RFI is certainly related to 
humidity/temperature. It has really Again if the utility is only using their 
ultrasonic detector, they really will not know if a line is severely 
oscillating at 50 Mhz. If they find nothing with their detector they may brush 
it off as a false complaint, right ? Again i have no issues with the PPL lines 
because they replaced all the old Bell type insulators. I have not had that RFI 
powerline signature since on any of their lines in the neighborhood.

My impression is MetEd needs some further understanding of RFI related to these 
old Bell type insulators. They seem obstinate about replacing them.

Stephanie WX3K


> On Sep 11, 2021, at 5:04 PM, Hare, Ed, W1RFI <w1rfi@arrl.org> wrote:
> 
> source before complaing to the utility. They are not responsible for noise 
> from non-utility equipment and a few false complaints can quickly put 
> amateurs to the bottom of their priority list, often not scheduled until 
> Nevuary.
> 
> Ed, W1RFI

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>