Dear Jim,
I just installed some clip-ons (unknown ferrite mix) and they reduced the
radiated emission by 30dB. I think that the last 10dB will take some more
work.
I'm curious what you mean by, "... without a second turn on wiring connected
to the source."
73,
Mike, W9IP
-----Original Message-----
From: RFI <rfi-bounces+nlsa=nlsa.com@contesting.com> On Behalf Of Jim Brown
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 2:59 PM
To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] RFI from geothermal furnace cathodic protection circuit
RFI at 2M is a good candidate for #43 or #31 clamp-ons without a second turn
on wiring connected to the source. You may need more than one.
Multiple turns through #31 will be required for suppression at HF.
73, Jim K9YC
On 11/17/2021 6:05 AM, nlsa@nlsa.com wrote:
> Dear friends,
> I am seeing RFI on 2m from the cathodic protection circuit in our
> geothermal heating system. The protective circuit's on-board SMPS
> generates a large broad emission around 150 MHz, verified with a
> spectrum analyzer and sniffer. Before I dive in with the usual
> filters and toroids, does anyone on the list have experience and
suggestions?
> Thank you,
> Michael Owen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|