Enough pointless hand wringing. Can we please stick to constructive
suggestions ?
73,
Steve, N2IC
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 2:09 PM David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com> wrote:
> QUOTE W2TTT, GORDON: " As for VZW and AT&T staffing, there are
> surprisingly few engineers
> available and equipped to troubleshoot
> noise and other forms of interference, but they
> do an excellent job when tackling a
> reported issue. Keep in mind that their networks
> (wired and wireless) are often impacted by
> issues with SMPSs and solar panels in
> particular. The trick is to recognize,
> measure, isolate and mitigate those issues. These
> networks are massive with millions of
> components and even with comprehensive
> monitoring, there are things that can be
> below the radar or be ambiguous as to their
> cause without correlation or further
> investigation."
>
> So, VZW and AT&T (and others) have joined ARRL in doing the job of FCC.
> Whether it's private industry or ARRL, we all pay for this "service". But,
> isn't this what FCC was originally chartered to do??
>
> When it comes to SMPS from China, FCC allows them to sail through Customs
> with no attention paid to EMC/RFI. FCC allows the integrator to be held
> responsible for the EMC solution when these SMPSs are incorporated into
> products. Once sold to a consumer, the consumer becomes responsible (solar
> power et.al.). What a "pass-the-buck" approach by FCC! And FCC has
> allowed all home appliances to go Scott free w.r.t. EMC/RFI. Again, what a
> scam on the part of FCC. FCC is NOT..... N-O-T ....fulfilling its
> chartered duties. We are all paying directly or indirectly for this
> shirking of responsibilities on the part of the FCC.
>
> Again, this could have been avoided for the most part, if FCC had done due
> dilligence during the early days of the digital revolution. They did very
> little (even when they had more clout!! And, yes, OET has been gutted.
>
> Dave - WØLEV
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 6:40 PM EDWARDS, EDDIE J via RFI <
> rfi@contesting.com>
> wrote:
>
> > And the internet as well, which is less reliable than the geographically
> > distributed AM/FM broadcast sites.
> > But lawyers aren't worried about reliability of communications.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: RFI <rfi-bounces+eedwards=oppd.com@contesting.com> On Behalf Of
> > MICHAEL ST ANGELO
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 12:05 PM
> > To: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
> > Subject: Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel Interference Case
> >
> > READ THIS FIRST! This is NOT an OPPD email.Be very cautious of any links
> > or attachments unless you recognize this sender - rfi-bounces+eedwards=
> > oppd.com@contesting.com and are expecting this email.Please click the
> > "Report it" button if you think this email is malicious.
> >
> > Many AM station bother staying on the because they can on operate on the
> > FM band via a FM translator license.
> >
> > Mike N2MS
> >
> > > On 04/05/2022 12:53 PM David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > And the "official" reply from FCC to the impacted (RFI) coverage areas
> > > for AM BC, "Increase your output power." Sure.....Yea......That costs
> > > the BCer money both for a new transmitter and continuing additional
> > > fees to pay the electric bill.
> > >
> > > Yes, where is the FCC??
> > >
> > > Dave - WØLEV
> > _______________________________________________
> > RFI mailing list
> > RFI@contesting.com
> >
> >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi__;!!AvPafw!axsJmUZ-JymMhOEXjl0z35QdDZWotp6LdAIPH8EODYuVVDVliviyrbPIo2bJaA$
> > _______________________________________________
> > RFI mailing list
> > RFI@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >
>
>
> --
> *Dave - WØLEV*
> *Just Let Darwin Work*
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|