Hi Kris,
You can't put back what is missing, (QRN removes data in a lot of
cases), you can only guess at what is missing and replace with that...
Turn on your NB next time you do FT8, and count the decodes, then kill
it an count again... I hope you are right, but I suspect it will be a
long time before a really good noise reduction system can do all you
mentioned.
73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
https://www.nk7z.net
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources
On 12/24/22 14:08, N5KM - Kris wrote:
I think it will be up to the radio manufacturers to solve the interference
problems we are facing. By that I mean developing algorithms that target
specific RFI types. As processing technology advances these algorithms will
be able to execute in realtime such that processing delays won’t be
noticeable.
For instance, we’ll see filter algorithms that can automatically take out
interference from solar arrays, variable speed motors, SMPS’s, etc. and be
able to track drifting noise sources. And, of course, the advancement of
digital modes will improve SNR.
Kris N5KM
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|