To: | rfi@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] DEFINITION OF "HARMFUL INTERFERENCE" |
From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
Date: | Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:41:57 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
On 1/18/2023 11:59 AM, David Eckhardt wrote: Yes, in my opinion, FCC is just a collection of overpaid lawyers who wouldn't recognize RF if it bit them in the behind. Further, OET has been gutted and Part 15, either subpart, is not enforced unless there is big $$ in it for the CFR 47 bureaucracy. Just my opinion formed over the decades (six+ of those) as a licensed amateur radio operator and an EMC/RFI engineer. One could form the same judgement by having read the (real) newspapers over half that time span. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] DEFINITION OF "HARMFUL INTERFERENCE", David Eckhardt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] DEFINITION OF "HARMFUL INTERFERENCE", David Eckhardt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] DEFINITION OF "HARMFUL INTERFERENCE", David Eckhardt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] DEFINITION OF "HARMFUL INTERFERENCE", David Eckhardt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |