I disagree with Bill on the RITTY software just for the reasons he have that it
was the 'best'.
My vote is for MMTTY which runs in Windows and can/is being used as plug-in on
logging software like Writelog.
It is just not worth the hassle for those few times when RITTY will out perform
MMTTY (and yes it will).
Back a few years ago, WF1B and RITTY was KING. But times move on and I would
not put my $$ on UNSUPPORTED DOS software.
But everyone has an opinion.
Joe K0BX
-------Original Message-------
From: Bill Turner <w7ti@dslextreme.com>
Sent: 01/20/03 10:39 AM
To: "Frank R. Hammond" <FHammond@cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Software
>
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 15:50:55 -0500, Frank R. Hammond wrote:
>BlankWhat is considered the most "robust" soundcard RTTY software as
related to its encoding and decoding schemes?
>
>Regards to all from Frank (KC4GKY)
_________________________________________________________
RiTTY by K6STI gets my vote. I have run Brian's program side by
side with many others including TNCs, and it was always the best
at digging weak signals out of the noise.
It does have a few drawbacks, though:
1. $$$. Ain't free. Ain't even cheap.
2. Requires a genuine Creative Labs Soundblaster 16 ISA sound
card. PCI will not do, nor will other makes or brands. You
usually can find them on ebay for $10-15 or so.
3. Runs under DOS, either standalone DOS or full-screen mode
under Windows. I have run it under Win95, 98 and XP and it runs
perfectly. It will not run in a Windows "DOS box". Full screen
mode only.
But if you're willing to go to that trouble, you will have the
best RTTY soundcard program in existence.
73, Bill W7TI
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
http://www.qsl.net/k0bx\r\nk0bx@qsl.net\r\n
|