| To: | rtty@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Petition |
| From: | Peter Laws <plaws@chinet.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:35:38 -0500 (CDT) |
| List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Howard Teller wrote: -> As I read the ARRL proposal, the *Entire" 160m band can be blanketed by -> automated Pactor-III robots of 2400 Hz width, without limitation. Can -> anybody show me where this is incorrect? That would certainly solve the problem of the malcontents .... :-) -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY/9 WAC (phone) WAS #51466 (SSB) Looking for MT on RTTY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Petition, Howard Teller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Petition, Thomas Giella KN4LF |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Petition, Howard Teller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Petition, Thomas Giella KN4LF |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |