Sort of hard to reclass people as multi op when the rules only list two
categories and those are:
a) Single Operator Single Radio
b) Single Operator Two Radio
But the final say on this is XE1J as he is the contest director/manager.
73 Larry L
W0ETC
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:42:16 -0400 Scott Nichols <snichols@mvosprey.com>
writes:
> I don't think this is correct...With a few exceptions, ARRL and CQ
> sponsored
> contests are the only ones that place "assisted" op's into
> "multi-op" or
> "assisted" categories...I think this issue came up last year, with
> the
> general consensus being that packet/telnet is allowed for everyone
> in the XE
> RTTY contest...
>
> C U on the screen this weekend ...
>
> Scott VE1OP
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
> To: "NB1B" <nb1b@comcast.net>
> Cc: <rtty@contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 5:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] XE RTTY Contest
>
>
> > On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:40:29 -0500, NB1B wrote:
> >
> > >The XE RTTY Contest this weekend- can packet be used? There is
> no Multi
> > >type entries, but nothing is stated about packet.
> > ___________________________________________________________
> >
> > The rules 'should' be more specific, but I think it's generally
> agreed
> > that packet constitutes an assisted, i.e. multioperator,
> category.
> >
> > --
> > Bill, W6WRT
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.5 - Release Date:
> 2/3/2005
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RTTY mailing list
> > RTTY@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|