Good idea, make that 1.805Mhz. You have to deeply respect ops on 160m running
5watts; give them some room. 40 meters is a mess. 7.040 is the CW QRP and the
RTTY calling freq. Why?
73, Jim
AD6WL
--- Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com> wrote:
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:46:00 -0700
To: IronmanY2K@triathlete.com,rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 160 Meter RTTY
At 03:59 PM 8/14/2005, IronmanY2k wrote:
>I would recommend that we operate on 1.809Mhz (1.810 is the QRP calling
>freq.).
_________________________________________________
1809 is pretty close to the QRP frequency. If 40 meters is any indicator,
those guys often use pretty broad receivers. I'd suggest we stay a little
farther away, say 1805. 4 kHz will make little difference with SWR but a
big difference with receiver overload.
Bill, W6WRT
_____________________________________________________________
Get YourName@Triathlete.com web e-mail - http://www.Triathlete.com
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|