RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] 160 Meter RTTY

To: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>, IronmanY2K@triathlete.com,rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 160 Meter RTTY
From: IronmanY2k <IronmanY2K@triathlete.com>
Reply-to: IronmanY2K@triathlete.com
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:05:18 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Good idea, make that 1.805Mhz.  You have to deeply respect ops on 160m running 
5watts; give them some room.  40 meters is a mess.  7.040 is the CW QRP and the 
RTTY calling freq.  Why?

73, Jim
AD6WL

--- Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com> wrote:

From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:46:00 -0700
To: IronmanY2K@triathlete.com,rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 160 Meter RTTY

At 03:59 PM 8/14/2005, IronmanY2k wrote:

>I would recommend that we operate on 1.809Mhz (1.810 is the QRP calling 
>freq.).

_________________________________________________

1809 is pretty close to the QRP frequency. If 40 meters is any indicator, 
those guys often use pretty broad receivers. I'd suggest we stay a little 
farther away, say 1805. 4 kHz will make little difference with SWR but a 
big difference with receiver overload.

Bill, W6WRT



_____________________________________________________________
Get YourName@Triathlete.com web e-mail - http://www.Triathlete.com
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>