RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW

To: "RTTY Mailing List" <RTTY@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW
From: "Rick Mintz" <Rmintz@Rochester.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:26:01 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Hi Shelby.

As the "instigator" of the current SO1R vs. SO2R thread, I have been following 
the collective comments with interest. With the exception of some mini-flames 
and clearly unworkable suggestions, I think that the thread has voiced a heavy 
bias towards separate entry classes.

That being said, the thing that is the most gratifying, have been your 
comments. That you will lobby for a rule change demonstrates your commitment to 
the spirit of the contesting community. To see the need to correct what has 
become a "problem", and act upon it, despite the negative reactions from some, 
is to be commended. Thank you for your efforts in behalf of those that still 
realize that it is a hobby, and intended to be enjoyed. Keeping the contesting 
component an equal challenge for all is in the best spirit of competition.

Those that choose to submit as SO1R as they use a single radio for SO2R 
operating, can live with their own conscience. They must have something to 
prove... to themselves. Signing a statement as to the entry class used means 
nothing. The act of submitting a log should be enough to verify that the 
"intent" of the operator was to follow the class rules as they were intended to 
be interpreted. The rules are not a legal document and stretching them beyond 
the commonly accepted meaning only supports the operator in his attempt to 
appear better than he really is.

73 de Rick W1TY/W2RTY 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>