I think I have the answer to this whole dilemma.
There are still some open dates left in the year so someone can create and
administer a new contest with rules that "level the field".
No matter how the rules are altered we will still participate because we're
addicted. :-)
Bob
KE4QOK
>
> From: "Steve and Judy" <hodgson@cytanet.com.cy>
> Date: 2006/07/26 Wed AM 03:43:04 EDT
> To: <rtty@contesting.com>
> Subject: [RTTY] SO1R and SO2R
>
> Ok Guys, looks like we all agree that
> SO2R has an advantage over SO1R - so what happens next ??
>
> What about looking at Multipliers.
>
> Why is it that in a lot of contests
>
> W/JA/VK/ZL Zero to 9 are mults
>
> Why not G/DL/TF/SP/F/LU/ etc
> Zero to 9 as mults also.
>
>
>
> Or then again why not just have the DXCC list as mults.
>
> That should even it up a little, as the SO2R advantage on the
> 3830 scores show that mults and not Q's are the main reason
> for larger SO2R scores.
> Which stands to reason as the 2nd radio is mostly used for
> picking off mults.
>
>
> Just an idea.
>
>
> 73 and cu in Tests, Steve ZC4Li etc.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|