Peter and Jerry,
I don't think you understood what I was saying, or else I was not clear
enough. I did not have a problem with N1MM incrementing the serial numbers.
It incremented the numbers correctly on both sending and logging. I did not
have to do it manually.
What I encountered was this - after I put a call in the call box the 4
exchange boxes remained grayed out
( SentRST/ReceivedRST/Sent nr/received nr)until I hit the space bar. The
next nr was there but grayed out until I hit the space bar.
The sequence was this in S&P CALL - space bar - F5 send exchange - log it
(CALL TU 599 123 123 de KS0M). All ok.
If I did not hit the space bar and sent CALL - F5 send exchange - unable
to log as no number.
BUT the F5 sent anyway - CALL TU 599 000 000 de KS0M.
I then hit the space bar to highlight the exch. boxes and sent the REPT
Exchange (my F6) to give out the correct number (NR 123 123 123 123 de
KS0M). I did not have to manually increment the serial numbers.
I don't remember having to hit the space bar previously. But, I really am
not sure what I did in the last contest. I will see what happens in the next
RTTY contest.
73 Dick KS0M
-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com]On
Behalf Of Peter Laws
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 4:43 PM
To: RTTY
Subject: Re: [RTTY] WPX contest
On 2/12/07, Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net> wrote:
> So THAT explains it! I wondered why I got a couple of 000's. I had no
> idea N1MM actually required the operator to manually increment the
counter.
It doesn't. Log the Q and the next one up has the next higher number.
If it didn't ... what would be the point?
--
Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train!
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|