RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the CW Sprint

To: "RTTY Reflector" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the CW Sprint
From: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:00:55 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Just thought those that don't subscribe to the contesting reflector, would 
find this interesting reading? Has someone, other that the "ignored" 
majority of contesters, finally understood what has been said for several 
years?

C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ku8e" <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the CW Sprint


> It's interesting this topic came up. Just the other day while having lunch 
> with K4BAI (and talking about the Sprint) I made the comment to John that 
> "I sure had a hard time working N4AF" I think I called him 20 times and 
> never made it through to him. Finally,
> he called me on 80 CW while I was CQing".  John's reply was " Yeah that 
> was probably because he was doing SO2R and working someone on his other 
> radio."
>
> Personally I would like to see SO2R go away. Before you SO2R diehards 
> start telling
> me to learn SO2R so I can become a good operator too...done it...  I did 
> SO2R for many years when I lived in Ohio and got to be very good at it. Of 
> course you guys that are doing it are going to find a reason to defend 
> SO2R because it gives you a competitive advantage over those that don't do 
> it. Those small advantages are often the difference between winning and 
> losing.
>
>
> Now that I more of a casual contester due to station limitations I see 
> many flaws in the SO2R concept. There seem to be too many ways that people 
> can bend the rules (or loop holes in the rules) and not be penalized. 
> Problems always seem to occur when a SO2R operator vacates his run 
> frequency and someone else takes it. A frequency fight usually occurs in 
> that case with the SO2R operator claiming the frequency as his even though 
> he vacated it.
>
> N6TR mentioned some who was calling CQ to solicit contacts on two bands at 
> the same time, That is definitely breaking the Special QSY Rule . Plus, 
> how do you prove that someone is not transmitting on two bands and the 
> same time. I don't think most SO2R operators have a lockout system. That 
> would break the rules because you be doing Multi-Multi in that case.
>
> It seems many contests have this loop hole that if you are not 
> transmitting on two bands at the same time you are not operating two bands 
> at the same time. (even thought you might be in the middle of a QSO with 
> someone on one of those bands.) How are you ever going prove someone is 
> cheating? The only way I see that you could do it is to have something 
> like the 10 minute rule they have for M/S stations in many contests - But 
> that would probably take away the competitve advantage you gained doing 
> SO2R.
>
>
> Jeff KU8E
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>