RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] CQWW, the 1st part... sooner than you think!

To: dezrat1242@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] CQWW, the 1st part... sooner than you think!
From: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:13:12 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Let's get ready for CQ WW DX RTTY 2008.

I am using FSK when at home or abroad and AFSK when operating from K1TTT.

I am happy with both. They are both good.

Lets get ready for CQ WW DX RTTY 2008 - no matter what-FSK or AFSK!


2008/8/24, Bill, W6WRT <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>:
>
> No one says you HAVE to use FSK to do good. For those new to RTTY, FSK
> is preferred if your rig supports it, which most do. AFSK can be made
> to work just fine, but it requires paying strict attention to audio
> drive level and avoiding hum pickup caused by ground loops. FSK is
> much more forgiving since there is no audio signal at all, just simple
> on-off keying.
>
> The debate between FSK and AFSK has been thrashed over many, many
> times and there are pros and cons on both sides, with FSK generally
> being preferred by people who have tried both. My only point in this
> post is to correct the erroneous statement below. No knowledgeable
> person ever said any such thing.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
>
>
> ------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------
>
> >.  DON'T listen to the pundits that say you 'HAVE TO USE FSK' to do good!
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>



-- 
73's Andrei
EW1AR-NP3D
WAS RTTY #455 from NY(all via LoTW)
WAS RTTY #549 from MA (all via LoTW)
DXCC RTTY #1,832 (all via LoTW)
WAZ RTTY #184
----------------------------------------------------
DXCC RTTY via LoTW only
Who has what? - World Wide Rating
Please visit: www.k4fo.com/cqrtty/
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>