RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY Roundup and the "Triple Play Award"

To: "Peter Laws" <plaws@plaws.net>, "Frank Fallon" <n2ff@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY Roundup and the "Triple Play Award"
From: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>
Reply-to: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@pclink.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 01:32:23 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I already have the 150 LoTW contacts required for this award *IF* I didn't 
need to do it again. So my question is whether there will be a new Triple 
Play tally grid that shows your progress toward this award? Otherwise this 
becomes a manual process to keep track of QSO's beginning in 2009 for many 
people. Maybe this will be spelled out in the QST article?

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Laws" <plaws@plaws.net>
To: "Frank Fallon" <n2ff@optonline.net>
Cc: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL RTTY Roundup and the "Triple Play Award"


> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 15:04, Frank Fallon <n2ff@optonline.net> wrote:
>> The January issue of QST, which should be arriving in you mailboxes
>> about December 15th, will contain an announcement of the ARRL Triple
>> Play Award' for working all 50 staes on CW, SSB, and Digital (RTTY).
>> Confirmation will be ONLY via LoTW.  You will need to be a LoTW user to
>> participate in any fashion.  Folks working you in say rare ND will not
>> be able to get credit for working you for the award unless you are a
>> user of LoTW.  Get those applications in now for LoTW certificates.
>
> I hate to rain on the parade, especially since I'm looking forward to
> working on my Morse "skill" (ha!), but the WAS module of LoTW has
> issues.
>
> These have been reported to the ARRL by many folks many times and they
> are usually met with "we're working on it" or even "just include a
> note in your submission about which credits are missing".
>
> The lack of transparency in the LoTW program is what torques most of
> the participants.  Every piece of software has defects, sadly, but the
> LoTW is becoming notorious for not being forthcoming about where the
> problems are and what progress is being made towards resolution.
>
> LoTW is not free to users ($0.10/QSL when you claim an award), but
> users of free programs like N1MM Logger and DXLab get better feedback
> and support.
>
> 73,
> Peter
>
> 3274 QSLs from 7849 LoTW QSOs (less 450 zombies)
>
> -- 
> Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
>
> No Trillion-dollar blank check for crooks!
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>