RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RU Practice

To: "'john'" <w8wej@citynet.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RU Practice
From: "Junior" <charlesw_anderso@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 14:24:34 -0000
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
John, Ted,
 Thanks. I have seen rtty up to 3630 in previous test.
Looking at this link it's not allowed.
 http://www.yankeecruisah.com/w1cgs/art/hfband.pdf
73
Charles/kk5oq


-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of john
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 1:26 PM
To: Junior
Cc: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RU Practice

uhhh, have we not been banished above 3600??  is that a band plan thing, or
a real regulation??
73 john

Junior wrote:
> 38 Q's 25 Multipliers
> Stayed on 80m testing out the shortened dipole at 300watts.
> Seems to work well into all W areas.
> Thanks also to Goetz, DJ3IW , for the lone DX ctc. A few others called 
> but could not get the exchange.
> Psk, Hell and Olivia was on 3580-3586 or so. Don't forget to check 
> below 3580 above 3600 during the test. Still looking for AK for the 
> last state on 80m.
> 73's & 88's ( I have worked four YL's the last few months ).
> charles/kk5oq
>  
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>   

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>