RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY contesting on 160 meters

To: "dezrat1242@yahoo.com" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY contesting on 160 meters
From: "Inbody, Don" <don@inbody.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:55:11 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Well, I can agree to that...putting up a 160m antenna is no laughing matter.

-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On 
Behalf Of Bill, W6WRT
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 15:00
To: RTTY Reflector
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY contesting on 160 meters

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:53:41 -0700, Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
wrote:

>
> > 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M
>
>I think that says it all.
>
>73 - Jim AD1C

REPLY:

Agreed. Anyone who goes to the trouble of erecting a decent 160 meter antenna
qualifies, I'd say. Quite different from slapping up a 2 meter J-pole.

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 4566 (20091102) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 4566 (20091102) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>