The MicroHam is a little slower, just slightly.
It is because it loads into a buffer and then is sent. At least that is my
feeble understanding. The only time this would make any difference would be
in a big run where there is stations calling one right after the other. I
put some thought into that, and decided that it really does not make a whole
lot of difference. The advantage of a one box does it all, outweighs this
little disadvantage. Now what is painfully slow with the MicroHams is if
the strict bps box is checked under the ports tab. Then it is sent really
slow. I could not handle that. Stations running that way (strict bps) are
easy hear the difference.
73 John wa5zup
-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Jerry Flanders
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:47 AM
To: pcooper@guernsey.net
Cc: RTTY@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP BARTG Sprint
At 11:38 AM 1/24/2010, you wrote:
>...
>Still can't quite get used to the slow RTTY sent from the Microham, but as
>more and more appear to suffer the same, I guess it won't make much
>difference, and I will get used to it!...
I have seen other guys send slow, and wondered what was causing it.
All Microhams do this? Anybody know why?
Jerry W4UK
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|