The question is whether 850 Hz shift would reduce the error rate on the low
bands?
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:37:03 -0800
>
>To be fair, there were earlier discussions on this reflector about 100
>baud error rates. Just blame it on old brain cells, but the web never
>forgets :-)
>
>http://lists.contesting.com/_rtty/2006-02/msg00405.html
>
>> [quote from the P.S. in the above posting] there was also a lot of
>> discussion on the reflector whether 60 wpm or 100 wpm was more/less
>> error prone, filter widths, and on and on... [unquote].
>
>73
>Chen, W7AY
>
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by ClamAV]
>
>
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by ClamAV]
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|