The discussion has centered around dash vs. Space. So let me ask at the risk of
offending those who already know everything there is to know - would any of
the other seperators (comma?) offer a performance advantage vs the dash/space
options?
Also - the usos discussion is excellent. And it got me to thinking that running
two decoders - one with usos and one without - may offer an overall improvement
with a glance between the two when times are tough.
Richard Ferch wrote:
> W6WRT wrote:
>> that brings up a question: What would be the advantage to turning
>> USOS off for RX but not for TX? Especially in the context of the dash
>> debate, receiving dashes defeats USOS anyway, so under what
>> circumstances would it be advantageous to turn it off for RX?
> If you were working a station that was not using USOS on transmit and
> who was not using dashes, you might want to turn USOS off on receive.
> For example you receive 599 QZE XCE with a couple of noise bursts, you
> ask for a repeat, and maybe you'd rather be able to copy the repeat as
> 599 -?3 12/ to eliminate one of the sources of confusion. With most
> modern software this probably isn't much of an issue, i.e. you can
> achieve the same objective by switching the case after the text has been
> received, but having a button on the front panel of the program gives
> you one more option.
> 73,
> Rich VE3KI
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|