Good point Iain. He should have been banned to the rf world, way out there ,
when he implied someone
was a bigot and racist on this very reflector. Disagreements are one thing.
I have knee jerk reaction's and read something in between the lines that is not
really there at
times. It's a habit I'm trying to stop.
73
charles/kk5oq
------- Original Message -------
>From : Iain MacDonnell - N6ML[mailto:ar@dseven.org]
Sent : 8/26/2010 5:12:04 PM
To : rtty@contesting.com
Cc :
Subject : RE: Re: [RTTY] Personal issues
This is a tough situation. If it was just a direct personal conflict
between Bill and Joe, I'd agree with a lot of the sentiments
expressed, but Bill is not by any means the only one to feel
personally attacked by Joe. I've experienced it myself, on other
mailing lists, and it's not fun, and completely uncalled for. We all
have our opinions, and the right to express them, but I believe that
no one has the right to publicly humiliate another because they
disagree with their opinion, no matter how technically skilled they
may be.
Ideally, what would happen here would be an apology from Joe, accepted
by Bill, and we'd all move on with our *hobby*, but somehow I suspect
that that may not be forthcoming.....
~Iain / N6ML
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Phil Cooper <pcooper@guernsey.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The RTTY reflector is a place for us to discuss RTTY, and RTTY related
> issues, whatever they may be.
> It is NOT a forum for abuse from anyone, least of all the moderator.
> I was not going to join in the argument, but it would appear that the whole
> RTTY reflector is likely to crumble if this carries on, and I - like many
> others - do not want this to happen.
> What are we? Budding SSB users???
>
> Whether the moderator has issues with one or more individuals is of no
> concern to the vast majority of users.
> I am sure I have disagreements on certain issues with several here, but I do
> not air them here, and nor do I expect others to air their personal
> disagreements here.
>
> Bill, I think it is only right that you re-instate Joe, regardless of your
> own views.
> To be fair, Joe is not the only person with forthright views here, and every
> now and again, someone gets hold of a bone and gnaws at it till the next
> time, but those folk don't get unsubscribed. Think of all the issues
> regarding SO2R etc.
>
> So, PLEASE do the decent thing and resinstate Joe. We really cannot let
> personal issues cloud an otherwise helpful arena.
>
> I think it has already been suggested that if you really cannot bring
> yourself to reinstate Joe, then you really ought to move over and let
> someone else take the reins.
>
> Come on Bill, do the decent thing!
>
> 73 de Phil GU0SUP
>
>
> ---
> avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
> Virus Database (VPS): 100826-1, 26/08/2010
> Tested on: 26/08/2010 21:45:19
> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 ALWIL Software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|