RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment?

To: "Roger Cooke" <g3ldi@yahoo.co.uk>, "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment?
From: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 13:34:56 -0000
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
The Region 1 bandplan at 
http://www.iaru-r1.org/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=173&func=startdown&id=67
 
shows:
7000 - 7040    CW only
7040 - 7050    Digital modes only
7050 - 7200    All modes

RTTY contesters can go anywhere up from 7040 but not below. CW ops can use 
anywhere in the band EXCEPT 7040-7050.

The problems come with the various 'centres of activity' such as QRP CW at 
7030 and QRP SSB at 7090. Maybe they should be moved right up the band. They 
get completely wiped out in their own mode contests anyway ....

>   Unfortunately, there are still some Region 1 countries that are not 
> enjoying
> the extension, and that frequency
> is being used for SSB. It seems a little unfair when SSB has a huge part 
> of the
> band, i.e. 7060 to 7200

Not what the bandplan says. 7060 - 7200 is all modes, NOT SSB only. Here in 
the UK, the RSGB removed  the limitation on digimodes above 7043 in March 
2009 to come in to line with the IARU region 1 plan.

Cheers,
John GW4SKA



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger Cooke" <g3ldi@yahoo.co.uk>
To: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment?


> Just noticed these comments about the placement of RTTY on 40 metres. In 
> the UK,
> our bandplan says that
> we operate RTTY in the 7030 region. We have been upsetting the QRP CW guys 
> for
> some time, especially
> in contests. At our recent Spectrum meeting, as Chairman of BARTG, I 
> suggested
> that now that we have the
> extension to 40 metres, i.e. 7000 to 7200, it would make eminently more 
> sense to
> transfer the data section to
> the more "normal" part of the band, i.e. 7080 - 7100.
>   Unfortunately, there are still some Region 1 countries that are not 
> enjoying
> the extension, and that frequency
> is being used for SSB. It seems a little unfair when SSB has a huge part 
> of the
> band, i.e. 7060 to 7200 but
>
> there is not much we can do YET to achieve this aim. I shall keep pushing 
> for
> it, but I think we will have to
>
> wait until those other countries have the extension in bandwidth too.
>  Now, wouldn't it be nice to go back to what 40 metres used to be........
>
> Regards from Roger, G3LDI
> Swardeston, Norfolk.
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Gary AL9A <al9a@mtaonline.net>
> To: rtty@contesting.com
> Sent: Sun, 5 December, 2010 3:59:10
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment?
>
> You can expect some disagreement from AK hams who are authorized to use 
> SSB
> in the 40M segment from 7.075 to 7.100 Mhz.  I believe the authorization 
> was
> made to accomodate potential emergency use, but we can use that segment 
> with
> or without an emergency.
>
> 73,
> Gary AL9A
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gordon Bousman" <nw7d.ham@gmail.com>
> To: <rtty@contesting.com>
> Sent: December 04, 2010 4:55 PM
> Subject: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment?
>
>
>> I'm wondering if it would not make more sense on 40 meters to have RTTY
>> contesting up in the traditional .80 to .100 segment of the band rather
>> down
>> in the 7030 to 7050 CW portion where we have to co-mingle with CW ops?
>> The
>> .80 - .100 segment seems to be completely vacant much of the time and
>> seems
>> like a wasted band segment today.  I know that some CW ops tend to get
>> very
>> irritated with the RTTY contesting in the 7030-7050 portion.  If I
>> understand it correctly, some DX countries were required to operate down
>> in
>> the lower section but now with the recent changes to 40 Meters band 
>> plans,
>> would it make sense to try and move up to the 7080-7100 portion so that 
>> CW
>> ops and RTTY contesters are not QRM'ing each other?
>>
>> 73, NW7D
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty 



_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>