Hello Don and All,
Thank you very much.
I think 80M is more difficult,
because a window is extremely narrow 3599-3600kHz
so we may try SPLIT operation
as We(JA) Tx above 3600 and Rx for DX below 3599.
Anyway,
I appreciate many QSO's in this year,
and wish you all the best to you in 2011.
73 Happy holidays!
de Hismai 7L4IOU
>Hello Hisaami, it is good to know that Japanese stations can operate RTTY
>7100-7125 kHz. Hope to see you there.
>
>Yes, by all means, let others know about working RTTY above 7100 kHz.
>
>Merry Christmas!
>
>73, Don AA5AU
>
>
>
>----- Original Message ----
>From: 7L4IOU <ncb02761@nifty.com>
>To: Don AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; RTTY@contesting.com
>Sent: Thu, December 23, 2010 10:04:47 PM
>Subject: Re: [RTTY] RU-NAQP Conflict
>
>Hi Don
>
>>REMEMBER, IN THE USA WE CAN NOW OPERATE RTTY BETWEEN 7100-7125 kHz. I've
>>not
>>heard RTTY up
>>
>
>It's a good idea.
>
>We also have the same segment for RTTY as "NB All Modes" and it actually
>uses for domestics Digital QSOs.
>
>http://www.jarl.or.jp/English/ 6_Band_Plan/
>JapaneseAmateurBandplans20090330.pdf
>
>I want to try in RTTY RU.
>
>May I QSP your idea to my friends by our mailing list?
>
>http://groups.yahoo.co.jp/group/RTTY_Contest_Info/
>
>
>73 Hisaami 7L4IOU
>
>>The biggest impact should be on 40 meters. I plan on staying high in the
>>band above 7080. Actually I normally operate up there anyway during all
>>Roundups when the 2nd radio is on 20 meters. I've had a lot of calls from
>>EU
>>up there so you don't have to be low to work EU on 40 meters. Running SO2R,
>>when operating above 7080 kHz, the harmonic on 20 meters is above 14160 kHz
>>so there is less interference between the 2 radios when operating 20 and 40
>>at the same time.
>>
>>REMEMBER, IN THE USA WE CAN NOW OPERATE RTTY BETWEEN 7100-7125 kHz. I've
>>not
>>heard RTTY up there yet. We should take advantage of this space and I hope
>>we see RTTY signals there during Roundup. I'll certain go up there.
>>
>>Unfortunately we lost RTTY above 3600 kHz on 80 meters so there may be more
>>of an impact on 80 this year as compared to previous years when both
>>contests
>>ran the same weekend. I guess we'll see.
>>
>>73, Don AA5AU
>>
>>--- On Wed, 12/15/10, K1FWE <k1fwe@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>> From: K1FWE <k1fwe@earthlink.net>
>>> Subject: [RTTY] RU-NAQP Conflict
>>> To: RTTY@contesting.com
>>> Date: Wednesday, December 15, 2010, 6:05 AM
>>> Now that the decision has been made,
>>> I think the more positive response would be to figure out
>>> ways to minimize the negative impact to both contests. Some
>>> thoughts:
>>>
>>> I'm going to assume that the high bands will be less
>>> impacted (20, 15, 10) will represent less of a problem for
>>> RTTY contesters that 40 and 80. So concentrating more on
>>> these bands when they are open might make sense.
>>>
>>> RU requires 6 hours of off time during the 30-hour contest
>>> period. So, I plan to take those during the overlap period
>>> leaving only 6 hours of RU operating during which I would
>>> have to deal with NAQP contesters
>>>
>>> On 40M I'm going to assume that there will be fewer NAQPers
>>> around 7080 than 7040
>>>
>>> Other thoughts anyone?
>>>
>>> CU in the RU
>>>
>>> John
>>> K1FWE
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RTTY mailing list
>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>RTTY mailing list
>>RTTY@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|