Hi Dave,
Well, while I was out shoveling out my driveway (yet again) with else
nothing to occupy my mind, I thought and thought about this and decided you
were
correct. I came back in and set my own profiles and the one of yours I
was messing with back to IGNORE ON.
Now I just got your email and I agree. You are right, it is difficult to
test with real signals.
As I understand it, with IGNORE ON you will get the frame error character
printed instead of not printed and, if you are lucky, it will be the right
one.
You might correct me if the above paragraph is wrong or makes no sense
whatsoever. ;-)) I'm tired.
73,
Kermit, AB1J
In a message dated 1/21/2011 8:25:41 P.M. GMT Standard Time,
aa6yq@ambersoft.com writes:
>>>I created a repeatable testing environment using AE4JY's Pathsim and
VE3NEA's RTTY compare. Decoding a -10 db SNR RTTY signal is noticeably more
accurate with "Ignore Framing Error" enabled.
>>>Drawing conclusions from weak on-air signals is risky, as the quality
of the signal changes from second to second.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|