RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RST/RPT Separator

To: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>, RTTY contest group <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RST/RPT Separator
From: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:59:26 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Space is in both sets.  Code 4.

Al
AB2ZY

________________________________________
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
Peter Laws [plaws@plaws.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 4:34 PM
To: RTTY contest group
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RST/RPT Separator

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 15:13, Dick <aa5vu@att.net> wrote:

> Please double check that you are using a separator between the RST and the
> Report.  A normal space is the best; however old dash is better than nothing.


We've discussed this many times.  A dash is better for RST+NR while a
space is better for RST+QTH (or name or other non-numerical exchange)
since dash is in the FIGS case so that you save the shift chars .

But yes, there should be SOMETHING else you will get asked for repeats.

It seemed to me last weekend that there were a number of stations
omitting spaces in other parts of their exchanges, too.


--
Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>