RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY - WB4YDL

To: "Paul Stoetzer" <prstoetzer@gmail.com>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY - WB4YDL
From: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Jim W7RY <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:38:41 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I see that now that I read the poorly written rules several times. I stand 
corrected.

Thanks Paul
73
Jim W7RY


--------------------------------------------------
From: "Paul Stoetzer" <prstoetzer@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 5:30 PM
To: <rtty@contesting.com>; <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY - WB4YDL

> Band change rules only apply to multi-op entries. The only restriction on 
> single-op entries is that you can only have one signal on the air at any 
> time.
>
> 73,
>
> Paul
> N8HM
>
> On 2/12/2012 8:23 PM, Jim W7RY wrote:
>> There is a 10 band change rule in CQWW.
>>
>> How did you run SO2R?  Just make 5 additional contacts per hour?
>>
>> > From the rules:
>> Single-Transmitter (MULTI-ONE): Only one transmitted signal is permitted 
>> at
>> any time. A maximum of ten (10) band changes may be made in any clock 
>> hour
>> (00 through 59 minutes). For example, a change from 20 meters to 40 
>> meters
>> and then back to 20 meters counts as two band changes. Use a single 
>> serial
>> number sequence for the entire log.
>>
>> 73
>> Jim W7RY
>>
>>
>>>     CallSign Used : WB4YDL
>>>       Operator(s) : WB4YDL
>>>
>>> Operator Category : SINGLE-OP
>>>             Score : 2,943,290
>>>
>>>           SO2R operations worked well and N1MM Logger was a pleasure
>>> to use. 80M actually was pretty good for me this time - after I figured
>>> out
>>> the antenna problem !
>>>
>>> 73, Jamie
>>> WB4YDL
>>>
>>>
>>>   I have observed all competition rules as well as all regulations
>>>   established for amateur radio in my country. My report is
>>>   correct and true to the best of my knowledge. I agree to be
>>>   bound by the decisions of the Contest Committee.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>>> believed to be clean.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RTTY mailing list
>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>