RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB006 NTIA: No Objection to Additional Data Modes on60

To: "'RTTY Reflector'" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB006 NTIA: No Objection to Additional Data Modes on60 Meters
From: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:37:57 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Ohhhhh, this should be interesting. What technological advantages are there
to AFSK ?? It is SOOoooo much easier to do FSK IMHO. Radios such as the K3
do make it easy with either FSK or AFSK. But what "technological advantages"
exist ??

Good thread.

73, Jamie
WB4YDL

-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Kok Chen
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 6:21 PM
To: RTTY Reflector
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB006 NTIA: No Objection to Additional Data Modes
on60 Meters


On Mar 29, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

> AFSK is the RTTY mode for technological novices ... those who do not 
> know how to operate their transceivers in the way the manufacturer 
> designed them to operate.

I would like you to substantiate that statement, Joe.

I haven't transmitted using FSK for years now.  There is so many more
technological advantages to using AFSK.

73
Chen, W7AY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>