Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB006 NTIA: No Objection to Additional Data Modes on60 Meters [now another FSK/AFSK thread]

["Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>]

I don't think so, but where would you disagree with his analysis?  Chen 
makes a lot of sense to me.

Good results can be had with really crappy signals, whether it be on SSB or 
RTTY.  I've seen some big scores with signals that had spurs all over the 
place. I think some op's do it to keep the QRM away.
73

Tom W7WHY


>What it does not explain is your 'Dr. Sheldon Cooper' approach to RTTY.
>Your seem to have an agenda that requires that everyone agree with your
>analysis and your preferred method of generating RTTY signals.

>In actuality it is results that count and good results can be had with
>either method of generating RTTY signals.





_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty