RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] Narrow Filters for RTTY

To: RTTY Reflector <RTTY@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] Narrow Filters for RTTY
From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 23:34:50 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
The use of narrow receiving filters has cropped up consistently on the 
reflector.  

Andy K0SM and I have been looking at narrow transmit filters, but there is 
something from that study which can be "translated" to narrow receive filters.  
After all, transmit filters and receive filters are cascaded (with the 
ionosphere in between).  A filter that is too narrow for transmit is also too 
narrow for receive.

To answer the question of how narrow can you make a transmit filter, I have 
written this article:

http://www.w7ay.net/site/Technical/RTTY%20Transmit%20Filters/index.html

Pretty much only modem developers are interested in transmit filters, together 
with perhaps rig manufacturers who are interested in applying DSP transmit 
filters to their FSK transmitters.  So, if you are only interested in receive 
filters for RTTY, just scroll down the web page until you hit Figure 2.2.

There, you will see a plot of the absolute practical minimum bandwidth for any 
filter that you want to place in the path of a 45.45 baud RTTY signal.  The 
absolute minimum bandwidth for an "ideal" data filter is of course the 261 Hz 
Raised Cosine that I often cite.

Notice from the figure that for no loss in Character Error Rate, the perfect 
practical filter will need to be at least 270 Hz to 280 Hz wide.  By perfect, I 
mean that the filter has to (1) be flat to a fraction of a dB, and (2) is phase 
linear (i.e., zero group delay), within that 270 Hz to 280 Hz.

If a filter allows more Mark energy to go through than Space energy, you will 
suffer the equivalent of sustained selective fading.  And group delay will show 
itself as something similar to a sustain multipath (you *really* don't want 
that!).

So, if you are going to place a crystal filter in between the antenna and the 
modem, you need to make sure that whatever filter you use has 280 Hz worth of a 
flat passband that has no group delay.  If not, you will incur extra errors.

How much error?  Notice from the plot that when you narrow the "perfect" DSP 
filter by just 60 Hz, you will double your error rate.  And it climbs much 
steeper as you narrow further.

This does not include the need to widen the filter when propagation conditions 
deteriorate and you have more Doppler scattering.  Count on perhaps even 
doubling the filter bandwidth when you hear audible flutter.

73
Chen, W7AY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [RTTY] Narrow Filters for RTTY, Kok Chen <=