Seeing as that is the largest value that a signed 32 bit integer can
represent I'd say it's due to the logging software not setup to handle that
large of score. I think somebody reported having a negative score, which
would also be indicative of the software having over run the total score
variable.
Dan K0TI
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Shelby Summerville <k4ww@arrl.net> wrote:
> Anyone else find this a little "interesting"?
>
> LZ6K(LZ2PL) 996 242 22:30 2,147,483,647
> K4GMH 830 213 13 2,147,483,647 PVRC
> EMØI(UT2IZ) 1021 240 24 2,147,483,647 UCC
>
>
>
> C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
--
Dan K0TI
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|