RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Comments by K4SBZ.. (JT65/JT9)

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Comments by K4SBZ.. (JT65/JT9)
From: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>
Reply-to: pcooper@guernsey.net
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:13:03 -0000
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Stan and the group,

I have to disagree with your statement about us being of a limited mindset!

My opinion is that most RTTY users will have tried, and probably use, many
of the digital modes going.
Many of us have tried most of them that have been created, and some have
lasted, some have not.

By contrast, many PSK users have NEVER tried anything else, and to an
extent, this also applies to users of JT65.

I have worked many of the members of this forum on PSK, JT65, and other
exotic modes, (including CW!), as many RTTY ops have been using RTTY since
the days of the Creed, and have gradually changed over to computer based
RTTY.
Many, and this incudes me, used various TU's that allowed us to try all of
the then-current digital modes such as PacTor, AmTor and RTTY.
In the 80's, I had QSO's on all of these modes. 
Some of that changed when MMTTY came along, as it was simply so much better
at decoding RTTY.
We are also used to PC's and interfacing, so that is one reason why you will
have better QSO match rates on LoTW with RTTY ops.

If you look at the cluster for any length of time, you will see loads of PSK
spots marked as RTTY, simply because a lot of these folk simply do not
understand the difference.
I've even seen JT65A marked as RTTY.

My main bug is why the JT65 group are so intent on hammering us RTTY ops
during a contest, yet appear so quiet when there is a CW contest on.

HNY all

Phil GU0SUP


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>