RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Ionospheric Physics

To: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@twc.com>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Ionospheric Physics
From: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 23:19:21 -0000
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Shelby, I support what you say completely. This subject of delayed response has come up before and I have seen all the arguments from multi-radio stations. I don't have a problem with SO2R/SO3R operation and have run 2 radios here, but the fact is that SO2R is only wonderful if everything runs perfectly. HF radio is not perfect and unexpected delays occur. I had maybe 10 instances in the RU when a significant amount of time was wasted waiting for a response, when signals were very strong and copy perfect. It was obvious that another QSO was being finished before I got my reply. This happened both when CQing and answering a CQ. That screws up my rate and rhythm when running because another contester expects me to wait for them.

I don't see any answer to the problem and certainly don't wish to restrict multi-radio stations in any way. Those ops have my admiration ... it's just inevitable that their techniques cause frustration to others at times.

Personally, unless it is a "new", for me, DX station, I seldom turn my station on, during the week. That is my "choice", and for those that enjoy operating any/all other modes, but not contesting, it is also your "choice" to operate during a major contest weekend.


Much the same here. Watch the spots and DX bulls in the week, work a few contests. Try to chat on RTTY if I see someone I know will talk!

Cheers,

John GW4SKA / GW0A


----- Original Message ----- From: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@twc.com>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Ionospheric Physics


AA5AU wrote: "The problem is that you would have to look at each contact to see if you worked the station previously in the contest, then use a different macro to send the S&P exchange. I realize it's not that hard to do this, but when running SO2R or SO3R, it would become very tiresome to look at each call as you work them to see if you worked them before, then use separate macros based on the outcome."

IMHO, regardless of how many radios are on your desk, when you are operating S/P, it is your responsibility to be as efficient as possible to the CQing station? After all, it was "your" choice to call! And speaking of "tiresome', very little infuriates me more, during a contest, as having to wait on a "multiple radio" user to complete a contact on another band, before returning to me. If I am CQing, and you answer me, you should be ready, immediately, to send the exchange, in an equally efficient format that you received it. If you are CQing, and I call you, I immediately return my exchange. I realize that there are other reasons for the delay, so please don't remind me of them. This is a competition, with incentives to win, regardless of their value. When you value your time, more than you value my time, you're being inconsiderate? Personally, unless it is a "new", for me, DX station, I seldom turn my station on, during the week. That is my "choice", and for those that enjoy operating any/all other modes, but not contesting, it is also your "choice" to operate during a major contest weekend.

C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6986 - Release Date: 01/08/14


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>