I think our moderator, Bill W6WRT, is very accommodating in allowing
'fringe discussions' on the RTTY reflector. The outcome of the FCC
decision will impact all digital operators, so personally, I don't see
this open discussion even close to the 'fringe'.
73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 3/14/2014 10:52 PM, Kai wrote:
Bob,
I've meant it as a courtesy to the others on this reflector. We've
strayed from far from RTTY.
73
Kai, KE4PT
On 3/14/2014 9:09 PM, Robert Chudek - K0RC wrote:
Why does everything have to be "taken off the reflector" for private
discussion? No one learns a damn thing in that scenario. And isn't
that what everyone is complaining about in the first place...
Decisions made in secret?
73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 3/14/2014 7:54 PM, Kai wrote:
Andy,
No baloney! I urged and helped Ed write that FCC comment. The
proposed experiment is real..
If you want to discuss this, we should take it off the reflector.
73
Kai, KE4PT
On 3/14/2014 6:29 PM, aflowers@frontiernet.net wrote:
(Honestly Kai, your baloney detector should have gone off instantly
in even a cursory reading. You did read it, didn't you?)
I decided not to reference this in my reply comments since these
comments may have been done in ignorance (I have no idea who N4II
is), but since Kai wants to hold it up as an example we ought to at
least look closely.
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|