To: | rtty@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Band Plan proposal |
From: | Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com> |
Date: | Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:45:36 -0700 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
On 3/17/2014 3:58 PM, John Becker wrote: * Given that the unattended digital stations are in violation of part 97 by passing commercial traffic This is interesting in that most of my time is devoted to pactor I'm yet to see this on any ham band. There was a guy who posted here just today that the author of SailMail, "has to maintain land based stations for Sailmail and charges just enough to cover the costs incurred. It is definitely not a profit making situation." Sounds like someone is charging to use the ham bands. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status, Terry |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Band Planproposal, Ron Kolarik |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Band Planproposal, Ron Kolarik |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |