RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo
From: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:54:16 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
The Region 2 band plan segregates emissions by bandwidth, application and mode.
It also suggests "unattended" station use should be limited which is the actual 
problem.

73,
Ron
K0IDT

----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo


piece/brand of hardware.

In any case, RTTY/data added to the voice/image allocations as I
proposed in my "late" comments:
   http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7521065473
would address all of these issues except Dr. Flowers' concern for
incidental encryption (and that is an easy change).  The smart
approach is to press each of your Directors to make K1ZZ withdraw
the League's RM-1170 proposal in favor of a bandwidth based solution.

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>