RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Estimating increase in bandwidth/interfeerence from Winlink i

To: "'Joe Subich, W4TV'" <lists@subich.com>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Estimating increase in bandwidth/interfeerence from Winlink if RM11708 is approved
From: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Reply-to: rtty@contesting.com
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 22:10:24 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Joe,

I got the bw off the ARRL site (http://www.arrl.org/pactor-iii ) which says
"The occupied bandwidth at the --40 dB points is 2.4 kHz".   I can make the
2.2 change if that's more accurate?

Terry


-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Subich, W4TV [mailto:lists@subich.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 9:03 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Cc: 'Dick Hanson'; 'Angelo Glorioso'; 'David Woolweaver'; 'Ted Rappaport';
'Mark'; 'Dan White'; 'John Robert Stratton'; Terry
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Estimating increase in bandwidth/interfeerence from
Winlink if RM11708 is approved


Terry,

One other issue ... PACTOR III is 2.2 KHz not 2.4 KHz.  That change will
further increase the additional interference by at least 0.5 dB.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 4/17/2014 9:36 PM, RTTY wrote:
> Thanks to inputs from Ted, N9NB, the model was changed where the 
> results are now in dB showing the additional interference if current
Winlink stations
> move to RM11708 max bandwidths of 2.8 KHz.    The average interference
> across the modeled 40 meter spectrum is 3.4 dB.   And yes, interference is
> the correct term since the stations are all automated and do not have 
> working busy frequency detectors.
>
> The new graph in dB can be seen at:
> http:\\64.128.19.154\Images\RM11708-2.jpg
>
> Two new assumptions were added to the list:
>      1. The model assumes a linear Power Spectral Density, PSD.  That 
> simplifies the model but it lowers the final results a bit
>      2. Each 100 Hz frequency bin starts at a count of 1 (rather than 
> 0) which keeps the dB/power ratio math in check
>
> Terry  AB5K
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Taking the existing Winlink stations and transmitting bandwidths and 
> changing the bandwidths to 2.8 KHz, we can get a idea on the future
increase
> in consumed bandwidth/interference if RM11708 is approved.   Here are the
> steps used in this analysis:
>
>
>
> 1.  Take the published Winlink call/frequency/mode list.  Determine 
> the current bandwidth and convert it into a spectral density format 
> where we total the total number of stations transmitting every 100 HZ.
>
>
>
> 2.  Repeat step one using a 2.8 KHz bandwidth for each station.
>
>
>
> 3.  Import into Excel, sum from 7.060 to 7.100 MHz.
>
>
>
> The result is:   3.6 times more spectral bins used if 2.8 KHz becomes the
> standard.     A graph displaying the results can be found at:
> http:\\64.128.19.154\Images\RM11708-1.jpg
>
>
>
> The X axis is frequency and the Y Axis is the total stations 
> transmitting in each 100 HZ bin.
>
>
>
> Assumptions:
>
>      1. The processing was only ran against US Winlink stations.
>
>      2. Only Winlink frequencies were analyzed.   Other current and future
> digital waveforms (ALE, etc)  are not included.
>
>     3.  Modulation is USB, no offset
>
>      4.  Current Winlink bandwidths are:  Pactor 4:  2.4,  Pactor 3:  
> 2.4, Pactor 2:  .6, WINMOR 1600:  1.6, WINMOR 500  .5, and  Robust 
> Packet: .5
>
>
>
> Terry AB5K
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>