RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Getting spotted by RTTY skimmers

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Getting spotted by RTTY skimmers
From: "Lee Sawkins" <ve7cc@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:17:11 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Starting your call macros with a couple of spaces does as well as <CR><LF>
and has he added benefit of not causing the text to scroll down the screen
if you press your callsign button several times.  All macros should start
with something other than a printable character as many times they get
tagged onto garbage characters and do not get decoded as intended.  Sending
your callsign twice with no leading and ending non printing characters will
result in no callsign being decoded without extra characters.  This slows
things down as the receiving op has to manually enter your call with the
keyboard.

Lee

----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Getting spotted by RTTY skimmers



> I did get spotted multiple times while S&Ping, but I think that was a
> function of being fast on the draw, so that the skimmers could likely
> have seen " CQ KA0XTT KA0XTT CQ N1EN N1EN N1EN "

Start your macros with <CR><LF> .... that will make sure you don't get
picked up with the trailing CW or TEST from the previous station.

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 2014-09-29 3:09 PM, Michael Adams wrote:
There are notes in the second section of
http://wz7i.com/cw-skimmer/rtty-skimmer.html

The primary trick is to leave trailing whitespace at the end of the
over.   I used "TEST N1EN N1EN CQ " («note the space) and "TU N1EN CQ
" («again, the space) and had almost no problems getting picked up.

I did get spotted multiple times while S&Ping, but I think that was a
function of being fast on the draw, so that the skimmers could likely
have seen " CQ KA0XTT KA0XTT CQ N1EN N1EN N1EN "   A few times, the
S&P spots even came through tagged as "skimqsy" or "skimvalid" in the
CT1BOH logic.

I apparently need to learn patience.  :)

I do think that the smaller number of RTTY skimmers online, and the
challenges of decoding RTTY vs. CW probably contribute to the reduced
likelihood of getting spotted by a RTTY skimmer versus a CW skimmer,
especially on 80.

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>