RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RM-11708

To: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>, RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RM-11708
From: ham <ham@odsgc.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 10:46:36 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Ron
Great point....
Jim AC0E


Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Ron Kolarik 
<rkolarik@neb.rr.com> </div><div>Date:02/21/2015  00:23  (GMT-06:00) 
</div><div>To: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com> </div><div>Subject: [RTTY] RM-11708 
</div><div>
</div>If you don't care about this delete it now.

The most recent ARRL Letter has as it's first article a warning about 
the Mitre license for experimental wideband digital
tests. You can read it on the ARRL website or on QRZ, I won't repeat it 
here but this is what I sent in reply on QRZ


How does the ARRL justify it's wideband digital proposal, FCC RM-11708, 
in light of it's stand on the Mitre License?
I guess when K1ZZ said all we need to do was "spin the knob" doesn't 
apply in this case. We currently have modes in
use on the ham bands where the user can't be easily identified or even 
decoded for content and now ARRL is worried
about the same thing from Mitre??? I'm confused.

Ron
K0IDT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>