Ed, Joe has answered most of your points pretty well but he missed a few
On 3/1/2015 10:16 PM, Ed Karl wrote:
Lastly, divulge un- encrypting methods for select OO's to police the
traffic so rendered.
There recently was congratulatory emails regarding possible rescue at
sea thanks to
Winlink . No definite answer as to "was the station a ham?"
Ed if you're referring to the Bounty incident for the rescue at sea
that's mostly a lot of PR.
The Coast Guard does not have an email address for sinking vessels and
I'm quite sure
if the boat was going down the last thing I would grab is the HF, modem,
battery and laptop.
The OO's can't police the traffic now, I turned a case over to them and
part of the reply was
"we don't normally monitor those frequencies/modes". Why is the traffic
hidden/encrypted to
begin with? Makes it hard to self police like we're supposed to.
73,
Ron
K0IDT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|