de JF2IWL Good morning
Here is analysis of my RTTY skimer server on JATRS by SH5 analyzer.
http://59925.org/sh5/jf2iwl/2015/2015_jarts_ww_rtty_jf2iwl_skimmer/
8783 stations in 48h may be little fewer than Tomi's result.
In 1,189 unique callsigns,
http://59925.org/sh5/jf2iwl/2015/2015_jarts_ww_rtty_jf2iwl_skimmer/allcallsigns.htm
Over half stations should be busted or "Caller's Callsign"
, on White and Blue belt (once or twice captured) may be these.
Of course I undesrtand RTTY SkimServ cannot avoid capture caller's call.
and Busted
Pse excuse me Salvo,
I captured you as IW1UN ,IW1QNN etc.
I did not use Master.dta to catch all station.
Dai JF2IWL
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:36:53 +0200
iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20/10/2015 18:00, rtty-request@contesting.com wrote:
> > 2. Re: JARTS RBN stats (Tomi kallio)
>
> Nice work Tomi TU.
>
> Side-notes may occur, but not to criticize UR effort Tomi, believe me.
>
> Pro
> Some degrees of end user filtering are still permitted by the app and
> also by the site. That's good.
>
> Cons
> The app doesn't permit all the filtering as EX*CEL, but it is anyway a
> good thing not havig to own all the M* suite just on purpose. (Pro)
> Great for a UN*IX laptop, out of Libre Office.
>
> I should wait comments and observations by others, as I am very
> interested in.
>
> Last but not least, generally speaking as was for the old tread with the
> tread then started by VE7CC ...
> Looking inside the data for IW1QN I have still to note several IW1Q, and
> one or two IW1QM or IW1QNM.
> The latest are applicable by rules. But the IW1Q isn't applicable at
> all. There newer was a callsign issued with 2x1x1 format for the now
> ended IW series of callsigns. Just some 2x1x2, like IW1AY as the sarter
> for 2x1x3 series for AY. I mean the first wasn't AYA, but AY, then AYA.
> I am am the 5th of that AY series, not the4th. The same for QN, that is
> the starter for the series. So, it's just QN is the 1st assigned of that
> series and QNA is the 2nd assigned of the same series. This mean 27
> calls assigned or assignable for the QN series, instead of 26.
> I didn't looked at all for W1Q or W1QN ...
>
>
> 73 de iw1ayd Salvo
>
> PS IW1A tells I am from Piedmont, as IW1Q tells that him is from
> Liguria. Segments of the IW1Ax, IW1Zx series went assigned, circa 1980,
> to 3 different regions in the Northe west Italy. The 3rd was the Valle
> d'Aosta. But several series went ot in use: i.e. no IW1ZA or other
> previous groups of letters went assigned, nor IW1HA etc. etc. Now the
> series as IW#XX for any Italian regions aren't anymore issued since
> 2005. BTW no IK, IZ or IU with a call 2x1x2 could exist, there wasn't or
> isn't (IU) the same rule as IW. Even for special calls, that follow
> completely different rules.
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
--
Dai NAGAKURA <ndai@cameo.plala.or.jp>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|