RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Two CQWW observations

To: Jamie WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Two CQWW observations
From: Mark Schoonover <mark@ka6wke.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:57:50 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
It was rough conditions for me near San Diego. Could hear them just
couldn't work many.

On Sep 26, 2016 6:52 PM, "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net> wrote:

> no busted calls ?!?!?!?! You must not have been seeing the K1TTT
> spots.....it started out good, but by late Saturday night into Sunday, it
> was dropping the first letter on many spots....
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Dave Hachadorian
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 6:39 PM
> To: reflector RTTY
> Subject: [RTTY] Two CQWW observations
>
> Two observations from the CQWW RTTY this past weekend:
>
> 1.  The VE3NEA RTTY Skimmers have definitely come of age!  I saw
> very few instances of non-cq'ers being spotted, and hardly any
> busted calls. Thanks to all who have been working hard on all of
> this.  It is a major milestone in contesting progress.
>
> 2.  The old adage about JA's not showing up in contests on Sunday
> afternoon (Monday morning in JA) was sure blown away in this one.
> There were TONS of JA stations on Sunday afternoon, on both 15
> and 20 meters.
>
>
> Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
> Yuma, Arizona
>
> .
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7797 / Virus Database: 4656/13089 - Release Date: 09/26/16
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>