RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Winter Field Day Digital

To: Bob Darlington <rdarlington@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Winter Field Day Digital
From: Al Hanzl <alhanzl@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 17:31:22 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
We operated RTTY a bit at our FD. There was RTTY activity but FD is one of 
biggest domestic operating events of year. Not yet sure of the winter FD 
activity. 
Al
K2AL

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 21, 2017, at 4:19 PM, Bob Darlington <rdarlington@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> More than half of our FD score came from digital modes out here at the Los
> Alamos ARC.   I'd say 25% of that was RTTY, the rest PSK-31.  I'm a digital
> guy and operated one of the two radios almost exclusively on these modes
> because I'm shy on the mic.  Our club was skeptical till they saw the data.
>  Digital is where it's at, and RTTY is very fast.   The only reason we
> didn't have more RTTY contacts was because we didn't switch over till late
> Saturday night -not because of a lack of activity.
> 
> -Bob
> N3XKB
> 
>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 1:59 PM, James Setzler <jms_k1sd@verizon.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> I've been asked by a local club to set up and operate a digital station for
>> next weekend's Winter Field Day "event" (FD is not a contest!).
>> 
>> How much digital activity is there in ARRL Field Day?  I'd heard somewhere
>> that it was mostly PSK31 with a little RTTY.
>> 
>> What is the latest consensus?  Any suggestions?
>> 
>>    73 James K1SD
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>