RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 on Field Day

To: <jim@rhodesend.net>, "Bill Turner" <dezrat@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 on Field Day
From: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:37:08 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
For FD, run both modes. You will have better Q rates on RTTY but it's possible you may run out of guys to work if FD activity on RTTY is light that year. So moving to PSK will let you keep running but the Q rate will be less as there will be more casual ops there and the occasional longwinded exchange will pop up from time to time.

73/jeff/ac0c
www.ac0c.com
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie

-----Original Message----- From: Jim Rhodes
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 11:15 PM
To: Bill Turner
Cc: RTTY Reflector
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs PSK31 on Field Day

Yes, but sometimes you need to move data.

Jim Rhodes
K0XU

On Feb 23, 2017 11:04 PM, "Bill Turner" <dezrat@outlook.com> wrote:

------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:44:11 +0000 (UTC), Tim wrote:

> In a real-life emergency would everyone crowd PSK signals into 2 -3 KHz?

REPLY:

In a real life emergency, the mode to use is SSB. It's much faster,
doesn't require a computer and conveys urgency much better than any
digital mode.

I love the digital modes, but when life and/or property is at stake,
give me a mike.

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>