--0-1804289383-967220679=:1238
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi,
I think you need to check logs in some way. If you just send in summary
sheets it's like Field Day -- "an operating event" not a contest. If you are
running a QSO party with a nice awards program you don't want to give those
$50 plaques away to just anyone.
In the MQP and OQP we encourage everyone to submit their logs in some type
of electronic format. That way K8CC can run it through the log checking program
that
he has. This makes checking logs pretty painless. Dave even has a freeware
version
of NA that works for MQP, FQP, OQP to encourage computer logging. K4EA - he
probably
would add GQP if you asked him to.....
Jeff KU8E
w4nti@mindspring.com wrote:
Right....and lets be honest here. We all know one can "fudge" things.
Especially during a very active contest. Contesters must be able to trust
one another, otherwise what is the point?
Dan/W4NTI
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Aldridge"
To: ;
Cc: "k4uk"
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 3:48 AM
Subject: RE: [SECC] GQP and log formats
> I did not realize there were as many folks as disappointed as I have been
on
> this issue. We had a great time mobileing around the state (16 counties),
> and will continue to do so in the upcoming years. But the downside is
> dealing with the time consuming task of the log. I vote for submission of
> the summary sheets only.
>
> Let's spend our time on the air, and make the reporting easy for everyone,
> including Neal and the folks that tabulate the results for all of us.
> 73, -Don K4PK
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-secc@contesting.com [mailto:owner-secc@contesting.com]On
> Behalf Of w4nti@mindspring.com
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 8:05 PM
> To: secc@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [SECC] GQP and log formats
>
>
> I have to agree. This emphasis on the new format for computer logs is
> agrivating. I enjoy contesting, but I'm using the N3EQF log sample. It
> does fine for me. Now I have to change out to a "cabrillo" format,
whatever
> that is.
>
> I've actually considered dropping contesting totally because of this. As
> I'm sure other's have also.
>
> Just my opinion.
>
> Dan/W4NTI
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:
> To: ;
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 6:18 AM
> Subject: [SECC] GQP and log formats
>
>
> > To: THE GQP "Contest" Committee:
> >
> > Although I've thoroughly enjoyed participating in the GQP the past two
> > years as a mobile, and look forward to next year, I was disappointed at
> > the recent exchange concerning future log formats.
> >
> > Not to the extent of skipping it next year, and certainly not nearly
> > enough to make any complaints to the group sponsoring the GQP or
checking
> > the logs. They've done a great job of resurrecting the contest (I
prefer
> > to stress the "party" image).
> >
> > But I would like to suggest that the GQP committee give some thought to
> > less checking and more "party" spirit. In my experience, I've never
> > found a submitted log that contained anything wrong except for simple
> > mistakes. And these never altered the results when corrected or
deleted.
> >
> > I'd like to see state QSO party sponsors encourage acceptance of summary
> > sheets only. I was told years ago that the Potomac Valley Radio Club
> > quit asking for detail logs. I concede the ARRL, CQ, and other
> > world-wide contests MAY warrant extensive log checking for integrity
> > purposes - but an isolated state QSO party just doesn't seem to require
> > it.
> >
> > I'm not sure why Neal referred to his professional programming
experience
> > in this context; the fact is, most people involved in contests are not
> > programmers and couldn't care less about a Cabrillo format or what a
> > programmer thinks about it. I think log checkers should be willing to
> > accept a log in any format (as long as the paper isn't being
> > recycled...); without logs it really isn't a contest!
> >
> > So I'll see you next year in GQP, and I'll even send in a log in any
> > format required. But think summary sheet! you'll have more time to work
> > on your antenna or mobile setup!
> >
> > 73, Norm, W3DYA
> >
> > PS: Although it's of no significance in this discussion, I was a
> > programmer/manager for over 27 years before I retired a few years ago.
> > Good users were more important than programmers then, and I don't think
> > that's changed!
> >
> > --
> > FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html
> > Submissions: secc@contesting.com
> > Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
> > Search: http://www.contesting.com
> >
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html
> Submissions: secc@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html
Submissions: secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
--0-1804289383-967220679=:1238
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<P>Hi,</P>
<P> I think you need to check logs in some way. If you just send in
summary</P>
<P>sheets it's like Field Day -- "an operating event" not a
contest. If you are</P>
<P>running a QSO party with a nice awards program you don't want to give
those</P>
<P>$50 plaques away to just anyone.</P>
<P> </P>
<P> In the MQP and OQP we encourage everyone to
submit their logs in some type</P>
<P>of electronic format. That way K8CC can run it through the log checking
program that</P>
<P>he has. This makes checking logs pretty painless. Dave even has a
freeware version</P>
<P>of NA that works for MQP, FQP, OQP to encourage computer logging. K4EA - he
probably</P>
<P>would add GQP if you asked him to.....</P>
<P>
Jeff KU8E</P>
<P><BR> </P>
<P> <BR>
<P> <B><I>w4nti@mindspring.com</I></B> wrote: <BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px;
PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Right....and lets be honest here. We all know one can
"fudge" things.<BR>Especially during a very active contest.
Contesters must be able to trust<BR>one another, otherwise what is the
point?<BR><BR>Dan/W4NTI<BR><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: "Don
Aldridge"<K4PK@MINDSPRING.COM> <BR>To:<W4NTI@MINDSPRING.COM>
;<SECC@CONTESTING.COM> <BR>Cc: "k4uk"<STANREAS@REV.NET> <BR>Sent:
Friday, August 25, 2000 3:48 AM<BR>Subject: RE: [SECC] GQP and log
formats<BR><BR><BR>> I did not realize there were as many folks as
disappointed as I have been<BR>on<BR>> this issue. We had a great time
mobileing around the state (16 counties),<BR>> and will continue to do so in
the upcoming years. But the downside is<BR>> dealing with the time consuming
task of the log. I vote for submission of<BR>> the summary sheets
only.<BR>><BR>> Let's spend our time on the air, and make the reporting
easy for everyone,<BR>> including Neal and the folks that tabulate the
results for all of us.<BR>> 73, -Don K4PK<BR>><BR>> -----Original
Message-----<BR>> From: owner-secc@contesting.com
[mailto:owner-secc@contesting.com]On<BR>> Behalf Of
w4nti@mindspring.com<BR>> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 8:05 PM<BR>>
To: secc@contesting.com<BR>> Subject: Re: [SECC] GQP and log
formats<BR>><BR>><BR>> I have to agree. This emphasis on the new
format for computer logs is<BR>> agrivating. I enjoy contesting, but I'm
using the N3EQF log sample. It<BR>> does fine for me. Now I have to change
out to a "cabrillo" format,<BR>whatever<BR>> that
is.<BR>><BR>> I've actually considered dropping contesting totally
because of this. As<BR>> I'm sure other's have also.<BR>><BR>> Just my
opinion.<BR>><BR>> Dan/W4NTI<BR>><BR>> ----- Original Message
-----<BR>> From:<W3DYA@JUNO.COM> <BR>> To:<SECC@CONTESTING.COM>
;<STANREAS@REV.NET> <BR>> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 6:18 AM<BR>>
Subject: [SECC] GQP and log formats<BR>><BR>><BR>> > To: THE GQP
"Contest" Committee:<BR>> ><BR>> > Although I've
thoroughly enjoyed participating in the GQP the past two<BR>> > years as
a mobile, and look forward to next year, I was disappointed at<BR>> > the
recent exchange concerning future log formats.<BR>> ><BR>> > Not to
the extent of skipping it next year, and certainly not nearly<BR>> >
enough to make any complaints to the group sponsoring the GQP
or<BR>checking<BR>> > the logs. They've done a great job of resurrecting
the contest (I<BR>prefer<BR>> > to stress the "party"
image).<BR>> ><BR>> > But I would like to suggest that the GQP
committee give some thought to<BR>> > less checking and more
"party" spirit. In my experience, I've never<BR>> > found a
submitted log that contained anything wrong except for simple<BR>> >
mistakes. And these never altered the results when corrected
or<BR>deleted.<BR>> ><BR>> > I'd like to see state QSO party
sponsors encourage acceptance of summary<BR>> > sheets only. I was told
years ago that the Potomac Valley Radio Club<BR>> > quit asking for
detail logs. I concede the ARRL, CQ, and other<BR>> > world-wide contests
MAY warrant extensive log checking for integrity<BR>> > purposes - but an
isolated state QSO party just doesn't seem to require<BR>> > it.<BR>>
><BR>> > I'm not sure why Neal referred to his professional
programming<BR>experience<BR>> > in this context; the fact is, most
people involved in contests are not<BR>> > programmers and couldn't care
less about a Cabrillo format or what a<BR>> > programmer thinks about it.
I think log checkers should be willing to<BR>> > accept a log in any
format (as long as the paper isn't being<BR>> > recycled...); without
logs it really isn't a contest!<BR>> ><BR>> > So I'll see you next
year in GQP, and I'll even send in a log in any<BR>> > format required.
But think summary sheet! you'll have more time to work<BR>> > on your
antenna or mobile setup!<BR>> ><BR>> > 73, Norm, W3DYA<BR>>
><BR>> > PS: Although it's of no significance in this discussion, I
was a<BR>> > programmer/manager for over 27 years before I retired a few
years ago.<BR>> > Good users were more important than programmers then,
and I don't think<BR>> > that's changed!<BR>> ><BR>> >
--<BR>> > FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html<BR>> >
Submissions: secc@contesting.com<BR>> > Administrative requests:
secc-REQUEST@contesting.com<BR>> > Problems:
owner-secc@contesting.com<BR>> > Search:
http://www.contesting.com<BR>> ><BR>><BR>><BR>> --<BR>> FAQ
on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html<BR>> Submissions:
secc@contesting.com<BR>> Administrative requests:
secc-REQUEST@contesting.com<BR>> Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com<BR>>
Search: http://www.contesting.com<BR>><BR><BR><BR>--<BR>FAQ on WWW:
http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html<BR>Submissions:
secc@contesting.com<BR>Administrative requests:
secc-REQUEST@contesting.com<BR>Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com<BR>Search:
http://www.contesting.com<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p><br><hr size=1><b>Do You
Yahoo!?</b><br>
<a href="http://mail.yahoo.com/";>Yahoo! Mail</a> - Free email you can access
from anywhere!
--0-1804289383-967220679=:1238--
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html
Submissions: secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com
|