Ed and all,
What you have is a bent vertical dipole. This is a useful antenna for
limited
space or temporary installation. It can be thought of as an inverted-L with
one radial. It does not, however, radiate at 3 dBi -- it sounds like you're
using MININEC ground or a high conductivity. Although it won't be as
good as an inverted-L of the same height with many radials, it will get you
lots of contacts.
I'll try to come up with some practical suggestions for 160M antenna
improvements for the contest season.
73, Gary
K9AY
>
> Guys, I was messing around with my EZNEC files a few days before, and
> came across an old antenna file I had designed for 160. When, I don't
> know.
>
> Would like for any of you with EZ to do a check on it for me. It is so
> simple, yet shows such a good pattern that I need to make sure I don't
> have something set up wrong.
>
> The antenna looks like a square letter C. Vertical portion is 70',
> with the top and bottom legs 93 feet, and the bottom of the low leg 10
> feet off the ground.
>
> EZ wires are as follows:
>
> 1. 0,0,10 0,0,80 ( this is the 70' vertical wire.
>
> 2. 0,0,10 (w1e1) 0,94,10 (bottom leg horz.
>
> 3. 0,0,80 (w1e2) 0,,80,94 (top horz pos
>
> Wires are segmented at:1 70, 94, 94 with #12 copper.
>
> Feed may be at the top, middle, or bottom of the vertical leg, OR at
> 25% of the bottom horz wire, which gives almost a perfect match.
> Source is SI. Impedence is around 54-j.7.
>
> TO main angle is 28 degrees with about 3+ dbi gain there, but useful
> gain down to about 7 degrees.
>
> Best yet, remodeling it on 80 requires only a height of 40 feet.
>
> How about it?
>
> 73
> Ed
>
> --
> SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/
> Submissions: secc@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
>
--
SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions: secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
|